Research ICT Spend Guidelines
Our PhD programme is for anyone committed to advancing the state of knowledge in their particular domain. Our successful PhD graduates are passionate scholars who understand and work with substantial data, evaluate theory and generate original arguments regarding a significant public management/policy, development or governance issue.
Students reading for the PhD are seeking to advance the state of knowledge in their particular domain by gathering substantial data, evaluating theory and generating original arguments regarding a significant public management/policy, development or governance issue. A doctoral thesis is a substantial project. The doctorate typically provides training for an academic career. It requires a candidate to develop a sophisticated conceptual framework, undertake independent research at the most advanced academic levels, read and interpret published debates in the field (and other related fields) and produce a thesis that contributes to knowledge in a particular field.
In the preparation stage for the short proposal the school offers assistance in the form of a course (currently called Social Theory) which is presented as part of the PhD first year. The key challenge here is for PhD candidates to demonstrate their potential writing without a supervisor. Once they have successfully defended their short proposal, students formally register as a PhD candidate and begin work with a supervisor on their long proposal.
The minimum criteria for consideration for acceptance are:
When lodging a formal application for the PhD you will be required the following documentation:
Applications are handled centrally by the Student Enrolment Centre (SEnC) . Once your application is complete in terms of requested documentation, your application will be referred to the relevant School for assessment. Click here to see an overview of the Wits applications process.
Please apply online . Upload your supporting documents at the time of application, or via the Self Service Portal .
Applicants can monitor the progress of their applications via the Self Service Portal .
Selections for programmes that have a limited intake but attract a large number of applications may only finalise the application at the end of the application cycle.
Please note that the Entry Requirements are a guide. Meeting these requirements does not guarantee a place. Final selection is made subject to the availability of places, academic results and other entry requirements where applicable.
International students , please check this section .
For more information, contact the Student Call Centre +27 (0)11 717 1888, or log a query at www.wits.ac.za/askwits .
Click here to see the current average tuition fees. The Fees site also provides information about the payment of fees and closing dates for fees payments. Once you have applied you will be able to access the fees estimator on the student self-service portal.
For information about postgraduate funding opportunities, including the postgraduate merit award, click here . NRF bursaries: The National Research Foundation (NRF) offers a wide range of opportunities in terms of bursaries and fellowships to students pursuing postgraduate studies. External bursaries portal: The Bursaries South Africa website provides a comprehensive list of bursaries in South Africa.
For information about postgraduate funding opportunities, including the postgraduate merit award, click here . Please also check your School website for bursary opportunities. NRF bursaries: The National Research Foundation (NRF) offers a wide range of opportunities in terms of bursaries and fellowships to students pursuing postgraduate studies. External bursaries portal: The Bursaries South Africa website provides a comprehensive list of bursaries in South Africa.
The institution has done its part, making public policy responsive to our challenges now becomes our responsibility
Master of management in governance (general) graduate.
I learnt how civic technology could be leveraged to improve service delivery and the lives of ordinary South Africans
Civic tech innovation graduate.
I can develop and execute inputs, processes, outputs, outcomes and impacts using the S.M.A.R.T principle
Postgraduate diploma in management (monitoring and evaluation) graduate.
We grew our research skills and learnt the importance of feasibility studies
Postgraduate diploma in management (security) graduate.
I have learned to apply a strategic level of financial management and allocation of resources to meet the service delivery
Municipal finance management graduate.
This qualification certainly provided the ROI, I started getting calls from big organisations, like the SA Reserve Bank, where I work now
Postgraduate diploma in management (pdm) graduate.
I am now able to actively listen, comprehend and question decisions related to governance and economics
Leadership in board governance graduate.
This course taught me about the importance of synergy within different units in an organisation
Municipal finance management graduate.
This Diploma helps us to think critically about pertinent issues within the public sector
I can now proficiently interpret legislation and policies, particularly those that directly impact municipal operations
Disclaimer: cancellation of programmes by wsg.
WSG is entitled to cancel or change the date of delivery of a programme without notice and for any reason without incurring any liability to individuals who have applied or are enrolled on the programme or any funders of such individuals (“participants” or “funders of participants”).
Without derogating from the aforesaid, and insofar as it possible, WSG will provide the participants or funders of the participants with 30 (thirty days) days written notice of any cancellation or changes in the dates of delivery of the programme.
Insofar as the programme is cancelled or rescheduled prior to delivery of the programme then in that event the participants and funders of the participants will not be charged the full programme fees.
Students who wish to apply for the MPhil and PhD programmes are required to submit a research proposal. Please follow the Communication Management Division guidelines provided below:
DIVISION OF COMMUNICATION MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES: RESEARCH PROPOSAL
1. TITLE OF PROPOSED ARTICLE
The title (or working title) should preferably not be more than 15 words. It is possible, however, that the title can change or be adapted during the course of the study. A title should include the following two aspects: What (exactly) will be researched, specifying the relevant concepts that will be investigated; and the context/domain.
2. PURPOSE OF THE RESEARCH PROPOSAL
The research proposal is the work plan, outline, statement of intent or draft plan describing what, why, how, where , and when the research will be done. A well-planned and adequate research proposal is essentially a road map, showing where the journey begins; the destination to be reached; and the method of getting there.
3. REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROPOSAL
The research proposal should comply with the following: It should be a well-structured, easy to read document containing only the relevant information for the proposed study. Literature references that substantiate the rationale or need for the research should also be included. (See 4.3 Literature Review.) The research proposal should follow a logical sequence indicating the process as to how the research problem/question will be addressed.
4. STRUCTURE OF THE RESEARCH PROPOSAL
4.1 Problem statement
The problem statement must be clear and the use of unnecessary idioms or clichés should be avoided. The background to the problem (i.e. the problem or phenomenon in practice, that is the management problem); sub-problems (if any); the consequences thereof; the necessity to solve the problem or improve the status quo; how the study or research can contribute to solve the problem; and the contribution towards the expansion of scientific knowledge, are aspects that should be discussed in this section.
4.2 Research questions, objectives and hypotheses
The purpose of the research must be stated clearly in the form of research questions, objectives and/or hypotheses, depending on the problem or phenomenon that is investigated.
4.3 Literature review
The literature review forms an integral part of the draft / final research proposals as well as of your final research script. The literature review examines, summarises and critically debates recent (and historically important) research studies and other information sources that are relevant to a proposed study.
A literature review should always address the following issues:
4.4 Importance, value or benefits of the study
Describe explicit benefits that will accrue from your study. The importance of “doing it now” should be emphasised. Indicate the benefits, uses, and value of the research and its contribution to solve communication problems. Also indicate how future research on the topic could benefit from this study. This section should convince the reader that the study would contribute towards the scientific evolution of communication theory and its practical application.
4.5 Research design
The research design describes what the researcher intends doing in technical terms. The study may be viewed as exploratory or formal. An exploratory study develops propositions, hypotheses or research questions; the goal of formal studies is to test the hypotheses or answer the research questions.
The following descriptors are suggested:
4.6 Scheduling
Include a time frame or schedule for the proposed study.
4.7 List of sources
Supply a list of the sources used to compile the proposal.
4.8 The length
The length of the research proposal should be about 15 – 20 typed pages. The typeface should be Arial and the line spacing should be 1.5.
SELF-ASSESSMENT TABLE FOR RESEARCH PROPOSAL
The following table can be used as a guideline for assessment of the Research Proposal:
1 = Poor 2 = Inadequate 3 = Fair 4 = Good 5 = Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Suitability of title |
|
|
|
|
|
2 Significance of introduction |
|
|
|
|
|
3 Problem statement, aim, objectives, research questions |
|
|
|
|
|
4 Explanation of research design |
|
|
|
|
|
5 Outline of final report (intended structure) |
|
|
|
|
|
6 Scientific approach |
|
|
|
|
|
7 Formulation and logic of reasoning |
|
|
|
|
|
8 Technical aspects |
|
|
|
|
|
9 Reference technique |
|
|
|
|
|
10 Bibliography |
|
|
|
|
|
Postal Address: University of Pretoria Private Bag x 20 Hatfield 0028 South Africa -->
Location: GIBS | Groenkloof | Hatfield Hillcrest | Mamelodi | Onderstepoort | Prinshof
Student Service Centre (for Contact students): Contact Centre - Telephone: 012 420 3111 Contact Centre - Email: [email protected]
UPOnline Call Centre (for Online Students): Call Centre - Email: [email protected]
Get Social With Us
Download the UP Mobile App
Copyright © University of Pretoria 2024. All rights reserved.
Careers@UP | Tenders@UP | Ethics Hotline | PAIA Manual | Privacy Notices | Website Privacy Notice | Disclaimer | Terms of use
How to write a winning research proposal: a step-by-step guide.
When learning how to write a research proposal, it is important to start with a detailed plan that outlines the objectives, methodology, and significance of a research project. A research proposal is a crucial document for securing funding, gaining approval from academic committees, or outlining a structured plan for personal research endeavours. Crafting a compelling research proposal requires a clear understanding of the subject matter, a well-defined research question, and a meticulous approach to planning and presenting your research. This article will explore how to write a winning research proposal and how to navigate the challenges associated with it.
A well-structured research proposal typically includes several key components. Each section serves a specific purpose and contributes to the overall coherence and persuasiveness of the proposal.
The title of your research proposal should be concise, descriptive, and indicative of the main research question or hypothesis. A well-crafted title captures the essence of the study and draws the reader’s attention.
The abstract is a brief summary of the research proposal, usually no more than 250 words. It should provide an overview of the research problem, objectives, methodology, and potential implications. The abstract should be clear and succinct, giving readers a quick understanding of what the proposal entails.
The introduction sets the stage for your research by providing background information on the topic, outlining the research problem, and stating the research objectives. This section should:
The literature review demonstrates your understanding of the existing research on your topic. This section should:
The methodology section outlines the research design and the methods you will use to collect and analyse data. This section should include:
Provide a detailed plan of the research activities and a timeline for completing each phase of the project. This section should demonstrate that your research is feasible within the given timeframe.
If you are seeking funding, include a budget that outlines the estimated costs of your research. Be specific about how funds will be allocated (e.g., equipment, travel, participant incentives).
Discuss the potential outcomes of your research and its significance. Explain how your findings could contribute to the field, inform policy, or have practical applications.
List all the sources you cited in your proposal. Use a consistent and appropriate citation style (e.g., APA, MLA, Chicago).
Be clear and concise.
Use clear and straightforward language. Avoid jargon and complex sentences that might confuse readers. Aim for clarity and precision in explaining your research.
Ensure that your proposal remains focused on the research question and objectives. Avoid including irrelevant information that does not contribute to the understanding of your proposed study.
Provide a realistic assessment of what can be achieved within the given timeframe and resources. Be honest about the scope of your research and any potential limitations.
Edit and Proofread
Your proposal must be clear, concise, and logically organised, following all rules of grammar, spelling, punctuation, and referencing. Adhere to the specific format and style required by your funding source or institution. Proofread your proposal multiple times, ideally with the help of a colleague or mentor, to identify and correct any mistakes or inconsistencies. Enhance the proposal’s structure, flow, and language to improve its overall quality. Ensure your proposal is compelling, engaging, and professionally presented.
Writing a research proposal is a critical step in the research process. It requires careful planning, a thorough understanding of the topic, and a clear presentation of your research plan. By following the structure outlined in this guide and paying attention to detail, you can craft a compelling research proposal that effectively communicates your ideas and secures the necessary support for your research.
At Unicaf , we offer comprehensive courses and resources to help you develop your research skills and succeed in your academic and professional endeavours. Explore our programmes today and take the next step in your research journey.
Learn how you can earn a scholarship., earn an internationally recognised degree from the comfort of your home., continue learning.
Elevate Your Career with a Master of Education from Unicaf University Zambia
30 Aug 2024 By Andrew Evgeniou
The Impact of Light Pollution on Wildlife and Human Health
Advances in Brain-Computer Interface Technology: Unlocking the Potential of the Human Mind
The following are some guidelines to adhere to:
You and your Study Leader should have come up with a concise well-focused title that is context specific and demarcated in a meaningful way
Introduction
In your introduction, you are attempting to inform the reader about the rationale behind the work, justifying why your work is an essential component of research in the field. You should define your problem in the introduction. By the end of the introduction, the reader should know exactly what you are trying to achieve The first sentence should be a broad generalization of your specific topic that you are writing about. You should introduce the title with a well-researched topical sentence that relates to the title and sets the context for your paper in the first sentence of the introduction The next few sentences of your introduction should become increasingly more focused on your topic, thereby narrowing the scope of your subject with each sentence Present your ideas in the introduction in a theoretical/academic context showing evidence of adequate research on your title The introduction should therefore be a mini literature review on the overview of your title It is necessary to use several introductory paragraphs to sufficiently introduce the contents of your paper in the introduction Your research thesis should be the last sentence of your introduction. This is a statement that summarize your entire paper in just one sentence
Formulation of Research Problem (half a paragraph not more than a page)
After providing a clear introduction your problem, stating your problem stating your problem should be simple. Your problem statement as the word goes should be one sentence accompanied by at most two paragraphs that elaborate on the problem. The statement may be in a declarative or in a question form A persuasive statement of problem should be written in three parts:
Part A (The ideal): Describes a desired goal or ideal situation; explains how things should be (provide evidence in literature)
Part B (The reality): Describes the present condition that prevents the goal, state, or value in Part A from being achieved or realized at this time; explains how the current situation in your study falls short of the goal or ideal. Outline the problem – what is the key issue? Explain why you think this is worth investigating
Part C (The consequences): State your problem in a sentence and identifies the way you propose to improve the current situation and move it closer to the goal
Aim and objectives
Aims are statement of intent written in broad terms. Aims set out what you hope to achieve at the end of the project. In other words, the aim is your title in reverse
Objectives describe how you are going to achieve those aims. They should be SMART It is advisable to limit these objectives to three and not more than five at this level Research questions
Your research questions set the goal for your research. It is advisable to limit the research questions to three and not more than five at this level. Research questions are in question form as the word indicates. The number of objectives stated must relate to the number of research questions The questions should focus of the title and topic The questions have the potential to contribute to the gap in the study
Importance of the study
Provide the gap of knowledge about the title and how your study will help fill the gap Brief definitions of concepts
Ensure that all concepts used are briefly defined
Delimitation
Ensure that the boundaries of the research should be clearly stated
Research methodology
Approach Differentiate and choose one either qualitative quantitative or mind your re advised to choose one and fully explain what the approach is and why you chose this approach. The choice of approach will be influenced by the aim of your study
Research design
Indicate design chosen and explain why providing references it may be survey case study, experimental etc.
Data collection tools
Indicate data collection tool chosen and explain why providing references Note that the type of approach and design informs the choice of tools.
Population and sampling
This should be meaningfully described The total number of population should be stated and sampling procedures meaningfully describe. Note that the type of approach and design informs the choice of population and sampling.
Data analysis method
The method of data analysis chosen and the reason for the choice should be explained. Note that the type of data analysis chosen is informed by the choice of research approach
Validity, reliability, trustworthiness and ethical considerations
The type of approach informs validity, reliability, and trustworthiness. For example, validity and reliability are only used in quantitative studies and issues of trustworthiness are used in qualitative studies
Literature review
Literature should relevant, important, and balanced. It should be related to your topic and your research questions
It should include a discussion of all your research questions Use a descriptive writing approach Describe the existing and established theory and research about your topic in your review providing a context for your work. Show where you are filling a perceived gap in the existing theory or knowledge Accurately references all sources mentioned in the literature and gives a full citation in the Reference List. References
Provide at least 20 sources related to the research topic and at least 8 different sources on methodology
All Annexure A items should be included at the end of assignment 02
Technical aspects
Format work accordingly, ensure that the following are in place:
Table of contents Page numbers Readability and scientific writing style Logical structure Division into sections with thoughtful supporting sentences that develop the main idea
Careful editing/proofing
The reference below is useful
Walliman, N 2014 Your undergraduate dissertation: the essential guide for success. 2nd ed. Los Angeles: SAGE
Prof MC Fombad,UNISA
Report a problem
Workshop on Information Technologies and Systems
The 34th workshop on information technologies and systems, (wits 2024), bangkok, thailand, december 18-20, 2024.
supported by the INFORMS Information Systems Society
The 34rd Annual Workshop on Information Technologies and Systems (WITS’24) will be held as an in-person meeting in Bangkok, Thailand at the Anantara Riverside Bangkok Resort on December 18-20, 2024, just after the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS).
The purpose of the workshop is to provide a forum for discussion and interaction among scholars with research interests in the cutting-edge issues of information technologies and systems. The theme of WITS 2024 is “ Navigating the Next: The Transformative Impact of Generative AI on Business and Society.”
As we enter a new era shaped by the transformative power of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI), businesses and societies are on the brink of significant shifts that will redefine their operations, strategies, and ethical landscapes. Generative AI, with its unparalleled ability to create content, simulate human interactions, and predict outcomes, is redefining the boundaries of creativity and innovation. Positioned at the forefront of technological advancement, the impact of Generative AI spans a broad spectrum of sectors, including creative industries, labor markets, healthcare, education, and customer engagement, among others. Furthermore, as AI-generated content becomes increasingly indistinguishable from human-produced work, issues surrounding authenticity, intellectual property, and ethical implications are gaining prominence. The WITS 2024 workshop is designed to inspire researchers to delve into the expansive impacts of generative AI. It aims to foster a vibrant environment for thorough analysis, robust debate, and insightful discussion on how generative AI is being integrated into, transforming, and challenging the conventional frameworks of business practices and societal norms. This theme is inclusive and engages research across a broad range of topics, including the following:
IMPORTANT DATES
Deadline for Completed Research and Research-in-Progress Papers |
(end of day, Pacific time) |
Deadline for Dissertation Proposal, Demo/Prototype and Industry Forum |
|
Acceptance Notification (Completed Research and Research-in-Progress Papers) | September 20, 2024 |
Acceptance Notification (Dissertation Proposal, Demo/Prototype, and Industry Forum) | September 30, 2024 |
Deadline for Camera-ready Copy of All Submissions | October 15, 2024 |
Workshop Dates |
|
All types of submissions should follow the specified guidelines on page length, font size, and line spacing as specified below. You are recommended to format your paper according to the submission template . All submissions should be sent in electronic form through the WITS 2024 submission system, https://cmt3.research.microsoft.com/WITS2024/ .
When submitting to WITS 2024, please select from one of the five categories below. Each paper or proposal can only be submitted to one category.
Completed Full Research Paper
Submitted full research papers are limited to 15 double-spaced, Times New Roman, 12-point font, 8.5″ by 11″ pages (including tables, figures, and references and 1″ margins on all sides). All submissions will be subjected to a double-blind review. Selection for presentation at the workshop will be based on originality, contribution to the field, and alignment with the theme of the workshop. Authors of accepted full research papers will be required to present at the workshop. Accepted full research papers will also be considered for the Prabuddha De Best Paper Award, which comes with a $1000 cash prize, or the Best Workshop Theme Paper Award. When appropriate, the program chairs may accept early-stage full research papers as research-in-progress papers.
Research-in-Progress Poster Paper
We also encourage research-in-progress paper submissions for authors to gather feedback on early-stage work. Submitted research-in-progress papers are limited to 10 double-spaced, Times New Roman, 12-point font, 8.5″ by 11″ pages (including tables, figures, and references and 1″ margins on all sides). Accepted research-in-progress papers will be presented as posters, with a designated space being provided for poster displays during the poster session. Authors of accepted research-in-progress will also be accorded time to briefly present their work during the ignite session.
Dissertation Proposal
Dissertation proposal submissions are targeted at doctoral students who have NOT completed their dissertation but have successfully proposed it by July 1, 2024, and desired feedback on the research proposed for their dissertation. Dissertation proposals should not exceed 10 double-spaced, Times New Roman, 12-point font, 8.5″ by 11″ pages (including tables, figures, and references and 1″ margins on all sides). Accepted dissertation proposals will be invited for presentation at the workshop and considered for the Best Dissertation Proposal award.
Demo/Prototype
Demo/Prototype submissions are intended for showcasing developed software or hardware prototypes and should not exceed 10 double-spaced, Times New Roman, 12-point font, 8.5″ by 11″ pages (including tables, figures, and references and 1″ margins on all sides). Additionally, demo/prototype submissions should include, wherever feasible, links to the associated software or hardware demo (along with screenshots to provide audiences with an indication of its functionality).
Industry Forum
WITS 2024 invites submissions from practitioners to share experiences and insights from industrial practices on information technology. We especially welcome submissions on topics related to the transformative impact of generative AI, the theme for this year’s workshop. Submissions for industry forum should not exceed 10 double-spaced, Times New Roman, 12-point font, 8.5″ by 11″ pages (including tables, figures, and references and 1″ margins on all sides).
Conference Chairs Ahmed Abbasi, University of Notre Dame Jingjing Li, University of Virginia
Program Chairs Sagar Samtani, Indiana University Jing Wang, HKUST Mochen Yang, University of Minnesota
Local Arrangement Chairs Warut Khern-Am-Nuai, McGill Pimmanee Rattanawicha, Chulalongkorn Business School Wattana Viriyasitavat, Chulalongkorn Business School
Doctoral Student Corner Chair Xiao Liu, Arizona State University
Editorial Session Chair Yingfei Wang, University of Washington
Ignite (Short Talk) Session Chairs Yan Leng, University of Texas at Austin Reza Mousavi, University of Virginia
Demo/Prototype Session Chairs Harry Wang, University of Delaware Wenli Zhang, Iowa State University
Industry Session Chairs Puwadol Dusadeerungsikul, Chulalongkorn University Dongwon Lee, HKUST Cheng Zhang, Fudan University
Web Chair Yicheng Song, University of Minnesota
Prabuddha De Best Paper Award Chair Olivia Sheng, Arizona State University
Best Thesis Award Chair Balaji Padmanabhan, University of Maryland
Publicity Chair Waifong Boh, Nanyang Technological University Ray Chen, Iowa State University Keng Siau, City University of Hong Kong Monica Tremblay, College of William & Mary Konstantina Valogianni, IE Business School Sean Xin Xu, Tsinghua University Inbal Yahav, Tel Aviv University
For any questions, please contact the Program Chairs, Sagar Samtani ( [email protected] ), Jing Wang ( [email protected] ), or Mochen Yang ( [email protected] )
Skip to Main Landmark (Press Enter)
« All Events
October 22 @ 10:00 am - 11:00 am.
The Office of Sponsored Programs (OSP) holds a monthly meeting called the Research Administrators Network (RAN). All research administration faculty and staff attend this meeting in which we discuss University and policy changes, internal processes and procedures, sponsor guidelines regarding proposal applications, and award terms and conditions. The meeting agenda changes each month based on what is happening internally and externally with our sponsors. All faculty and staff are allowed to submit questions and agenda items. The meeting allows both OSP and the Office of Contacts and Grant Accounting (CGA) to provide regular updates and training to faculty and staff, ensuring we are all on the same page. Research Administrators can use this forum to network and build relationships that will support their development and growth in research administration. OSP disseminates all information shared during this meeting in writing to participants, so they have the information they need to complete their work. The meetings also help to facilitate a more team-oriented environment where we can work together to solve problems, create procedures, and gain a better understanding and appreciation for the people we work with whose work overlaps and intersects with ours.
The RAN “Lunch and Learn” Series: We encourage all staff who have attended a training or conference to volunteer to present a topic session to RAN. We call this the RAN “Lunch and Learn Series.” Sessions occur during the summer months of June and July. We typically hold four sessions on different research administration topics, two per month.
10 Sep Intimations of Apocalypse: Catastrophist and Gradualist Imaginings of the Planetary Future WiSER Seminar Room, Wits University 13:00
11 Sep Deadly Simplifications: Imagining the Future in a Warming World Senate Room 16:00
05 Sep Designing & building your course on ulwazi Online Event 10:30
05 Sep Lenn Smith Fun Run 2024 Wits Club 12:30
Wits In 60 Seconds
AngloGold Ashanti leaves a legacy through donating R87.5 million to support more than 200 students from mining communities. We unveil a rare meteorite discovered by a nine-year-old girl in the Eastern Cape, sparking a major scientific investigation by South African universities. The streets of Braamfontein were painted blue and gold as Witsies celebrated 103 years of excellence. The Wits LINK Centre, in partnership with ITU, introduced a digital skills programme for African policymakers and Wits hosts the 22nd Nelson Mandela Annual Lecture on 28 September, featuring Nobel Prize winner Abdulrazak Gurnah. Read more at www.wits.ac.za/news
SA's Youth to Benefit from Wits AngloGold Ashanti Legacy Scholarship Endowment
The R87,5 million Wits AngloGold Ashanti Legacy Scholarship Endowment will offer comprehensive funding and support over the duration of their studies to eligible students from disadvantaged and rural families with links to the mining industry and AngloGold Ashanti’s former gold mines in South Africa. The scholarship is part of a larger investment in legacy projects in education and agriculture that AngloGold Ashanti will carry out over the next five years to recognise the company’s commitment to South Africa, its employees and its communities.
Want a closer look at life on campus? Follow us on LinkedIn, Instagram, Facebook, Twitter, TikTok to catch the latest updates, student stories, and campus highlights!
Apply now Job no: 532931 Work type: Staff Full-Time Location: Main Campus (Gainesville, FL) Categories: Libraries/Museums Department: 56010200 - NH-BUDGET / HUMAN RESOURCES
Classification Title: | Research Administrator II |
---|---|
Job Description: | As a Research Administrator II, you will be responsible for a wide range of tasks spanning the entire lifecycle of research projects, from grant opportunity identification to proposal submission, award management, and compliance oversight. Your primary responsibilities will include: Grant Preparation/Submission:
|
Expected Salary: | Salary range $62,000.00 - $72,000.00, commensurate with education and experience. |
Minimum Requirements: | |
Preferred Qualifications: | Familiarity with myUFL, myinvestiGator, Microsoft Office (especially Excel), and UFIRST. Ability to understand and apply applicable rules, regulations, policies and procedures, especially as they relate to grant proposals and appropriate activities. Strong customer service skills, especially when faced with an unfamiliar question or problem. Excellent reading comprehension and written communication skills, both oral and written. Ability to work independently and utilize problem-solving techniques. Detail oriented and strong familiarity with UF accounting principles and cost accounting standards. Ability to plan, organize, coordinate work assignments and multi-task when needed.
Transparency through open and honest communication
|
Special Instructions to Applicants: | In order to be considered, you must upload your cover letter and resume. Application must be submitted by 11:55 p.m. (ET) of the posting end date. |
Health Assessment Required: | No |
Advertised: 27 Aug 2024 Eastern Daylight Time Applications close: 09 Sep 2024 Eastern Daylight Time
Back to search results Apply now Refer a friend
Position | Department | Location | Closes |
---|---|---|---|
56010200 - NH-BUDGET / HUMAN RESOURCES | Main Campus (Gainesville, FL) | ||
The Florida Museum of Natural History seeks a Research Administrator II to provide professional oversight, guidance and coordination of intricate, large scale proposals. With exceptional communication skills, this individual should excel at organizing and facilitating collaboration among diverse teams to produce high-quality proposals within specified timelines. The Research Administrator will act as a consultant during the proposal development phase, providing expertise in structural design, budgetary considerations, cost-share strategies, and overall strategic planning. This position will additionally play a crucial role in identifying key opportunities for research funding and ensuring faculty are pursuing these opportunities. This position will be responsible for the professional oversight, guidance and coordination of various aspects of pre-award and post-award grant administration and fiscal operations. The ideal candidate will have strong analytical skills, experience in research administration, and a commitment to providing exceptional customer service. |
Powered by PageUp
The University is committed to non-discrimination with respect to race, creed, color, religion, age, disability, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity and expression, marital status, national origin, political opinions or affiliations, genetic information and veteran status in all aspects of employment including recruitment, hiring, promotions, transfers, discipline, terminations, wage and salary administration, benefits, and training.
We will email you new jobs that match this search.
Ok, we will send you jobs like this.
The email address was invalid, please check for errors.
You must agree to the privacy statement
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Learn how to write a research proposal for higher degrees in the Faculty of Health Sciences at Wits University. Find out the contents, format, structure and tips for a successful proposal.
Guidelines on the Preparation of the Research Proposal This is a guideline document to assist candidates on the content of Research Proposals. Research Proposals should include the following components:
Protocols & Research Proposal/assessor groups Guidelines for Protocol Assessment Recommendation for appointment of supervisor (s) of research report, dissertation or thesis A quick and understandable guide to copyright and plagiarism policies by Dr. Glenda Myers Guidelines on proposal development What consitutes an MMed research report
Research report for M asters by Dissertation . University of Witwatersrand . Faculty of Commerce, Law, and Management . Wits School of Governance . ASSESSING WHETHER POLITICAL-ADMINISTRATIVE RELATIONSHIPS AFFECT STABILITY IN SOUTH AFRICA . Name: Nosipho Mjekula . Student Number: 1570022 . Student email address: [email protected]
Share with us • your name, • your discipline and • why you signed on to this training event . 6
Research protocol submitted to seek ethical clearance from the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Health Science, University of the Witwatersrand, in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Family Medicine
This Research Data Management Policy describes the expected practices and procedures to be followed when working with research data. It operates within the general principles outlined in the University Research Integrity policy (Wits University, 2020), the Singapore Statement on research integrity (Singapore Statement on Research Integrity, 2010), the requirements of research funders and ...
Our PhD programme is for anyone committed to advancing the state of knowledge in their particular domain. Our successful PhD graduates are passionate scholars who understand and work with substantial data, evaluate theory and generate original arguments regarding a significant public management/policy, development or governance issue.
This Community hosts a collection of electronic theses and dissertations (ETDs) submitted by doctoral and masters' students of Wits University.
wits_researchproposal - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. WITS research proposal guidelines
Students are entitled to appropriate supervision while revising theses in response to examiners' reports. STEP 1: Submission of Research Proposal After registration, full-time candidates are required to submit a research proposal within four months (MSc Diss) or six months (PhD).
The research proposal is the work plan, outline, statement of intent or draft plan describing what, why, how, where, and when the research will be done. A well-planned and adequate research proposal is essentially a road map, showing where the journey begins; the destination to be reached; and the method of getting there.
Understanding the Components of a Research Proposal. A well-structured research proposal typically includes several key components. Each section serves a specific purpose and contributes to the overall coherence and persuasiveness of the proposal. 1. Title. The title of your research proposal should be concise, descriptive, and indicative of ...
Proposal writting guideline. The following are some guidelines to adhere to: Title. You and your Study Leader should have come up with a concise well-focused title that is context specific and demarcated in a meaningful way. Introduction. In your introduction, you are attempting to inform the reader about the rationale behind the work ...
Deadline for Completed Research and Research-in-Progress Papers. August 8, 2024. August 18, 2024. (end of day, Pacific time) Deadline for Dissertation Proposal, Demo/Prototype and Industry Forum. September 1, 2024. September 15, 2024. Acceptance Notification (Completed Research and Research-in-Progress Papers) September 20, 2024.
Research Report Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Social and Psychological Research in the Department of Psychology, School of Human and Community Development, Faculty of Humanities, at the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.
From the Office of Research and Sponsored Programs Refer to the RSP website for additional information, proposal guidelines, and application forms. The deadlines listed below are for the dates that applications (eSign forms) with attached proposal materials are due to RSP (applications are formally submitted on your behalf by your College Dean).
1.10 Timeline and Milestones Provide a realistic timeline for your research, outlining key milestones like proposal defence, data collection, analysis, and writing of thesis chapters. *Minimum of 6 and maximum of 10 pages; prioritize the most important information, such as the research problem, research question, methodology, and expected contribution. avoid including extraneous details; use ...
The Office of Sponsored Programs (OSP) holds a monthly meeting called the Research Administrators Network (RAN). All research administration faculty and staff attend this meeting in which we discuss University and policy changes, internal processes and procedures, sponsor guidelines regarding proposal applications, and award terms and conditions.
Library Management System Proposal University of Maryland (System) ... Library Systems Analysis Guidelines Edward A. Chapman,Paul L. St. Pierre,John Lubans,1970 Guide to systems ... web sep 12 2023 now you can test your wits every day of the week each weekday your host ray hamel concocts a
rch findings during the course of their degree programmes. Consequently, the FHS has introduced formats of theses, dissertations and research reports which enable submission of published articles for final examination. The articles should be published in Department of Higher Education and Training-accredited journals and should be derived from the research projects approved by the Faculty ...
Research Administrator II. Job Description: As a Research Administrator II, you will be responsible for a wide range of tasks spanning the entire lifecycle of research projects, from grant opportunity identification to proposal submission, award management, and compliance oversight. Your primary responsibilities will include:
The Black Jacobins C.L.R. James,2023-08-22 A powerful and impassioned historical account of the largest successful revolt by enslaved people in history the Haitian Revolution of 1791 1803 One of the seminal texts about the history of slavery and abolition Provocative and