Weekend batch
Avijeet is a Senior Research Analyst at Simplilearn. Passionate about Data Analytics, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning, Avijeet is also interested in politics, cricket, and football.
Free eBook: Top Programming Languages For A Data Scientist
Normality Test in Minitab: Minitab with Statistics
Machine Learning Career Guide: A Playbook to Becoming a Machine Learning Engineer
Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, automatically generate references for free.
Published on 6 May 2022 by Shona McCombes .
A hypothesis is a statement that can be tested by scientific research. If you want to test a relationship between two or more variables, you need to write hypotheses before you start your experiment or data collection.
What is a hypothesis, developing a hypothesis (with example), hypothesis examples, frequently asked questions about writing hypotheses.
A hypothesis states your predictions about what your research will find. It is a tentative answer to your research question that has not yet been tested. For some research projects, you might have to write several hypotheses that address different aspects of your research question.
A hypothesis is not just a guess – it should be based on existing theories and knowledge. It also has to be testable, which means you can support or refute it through scientific research methods (such as experiments, observations, and statistical analysis of data).
Hypotheses propose a relationship between two or more variables . An independent variable is something the researcher changes or controls. A dependent variable is something the researcher observes and measures.
In this example, the independent variable is exposure to the sun – the assumed cause . The dependent variable is the level of happiness – the assumed effect .
Step 1: ask a question.
Writing a hypothesis begins with a research question that you want to answer. The question should be focused, specific, and researchable within the constraints of your project.
Your initial answer to the question should be based on what is already known about the topic. Look for theories and previous studies to help you form educated assumptions about what your research will find.
At this stage, you might construct a conceptual framework to identify which variables you will study and what you think the relationships are between them. Sometimes, you’ll have to operationalise more complex constructs.
Now you should have some idea of what you expect to find. Write your initial answer to the question in a clear, concise sentence.
You need to make sure your hypothesis is specific and testable. There are various ways of phrasing a hypothesis, but all the terms you use should have clear definitions, and the hypothesis should contain:
To identify the variables, you can write a simple prediction in if … then form. The first part of the sentence states the independent variable and the second part states the dependent variable.
In academic research, hypotheses are more commonly phrased in terms of correlations or effects, where you directly state the predicted relationship between variables.
If you are comparing two groups, the hypothesis can state what difference you expect to find between them.
If your research involves statistical hypothesis testing , you will also have to write a null hypothesis. The null hypothesis is the default position that there is no association between the variables. The null hypothesis is written as H 0 , while the alternative hypothesis is H 1 or H a .
Research question | Hypothesis | Null hypothesis |
---|---|---|
What are the health benefits of eating an apple a day? | Increasing apple consumption in over-60s will result in decreasing frequency of doctor’s visits. | Increasing apple consumption in over-60s will have no effect on frequency of doctor’s visits. |
Which airlines have the most delays? | Low-cost airlines are more likely to have delays than premium airlines. | Low-cost and premium airlines are equally likely to have delays. |
Can flexible work arrangements improve job satisfaction? | Employees who have flexible working hours will report greater job satisfaction than employees who work fixed hours. | There is no relationship between working hour flexibility and job satisfaction. |
How effective is secondary school sex education at reducing teen pregnancies? | Teenagers who received sex education lessons throughout secondary school will have lower rates of unplanned pregnancy than teenagers who did not receive any sex education. | Secondary school sex education has no effect on teen pregnancy rates. |
What effect does daily use of social media have on the attention span of under-16s? | There is a negative correlation between time spent on social media and attention span in under-16s. | There is no relationship between social media use and attention span in under-16s. |
Hypothesis testing is a formal procedure for investigating our ideas about the world using statistics. It is used by scientists to test specific predictions, called hypotheses , by calculating how likely it is that a pattern or relationship between variables could have arisen by chance.
A hypothesis is not just a guess. It should be based on existing theories and knowledge. It also has to be testable, which means you can support or refute it through scientific research methods (such as experiments, observations, and statistical analysis of data).
A research hypothesis is your proposed answer to your research question. The research hypothesis usually includes an explanation (‘ x affects y because …’).
A statistical hypothesis, on the other hand, is a mathematical statement about a population parameter. Statistical hypotheses always come in pairs: the null and alternative hypotheses. In a well-designed study , the statistical hypotheses correspond logically to the research hypothesis.
If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the ‘Cite this Scribbr article’ button to automatically add the citation to our free Reference Generator.
McCombes, S. (2022, May 06). How to Write a Strong Hypothesis | Guide & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved 29 August 2024, from https://www.scribbr.co.uk/research-methods/hypothesis-writing/
Other students also liked, operationalisation | a guide with examples, pros & cons, what is a conceptual framework | tips & examples, a quick guide to experimental design | 5 steps & examples.
Varun Saharawat is a seasoned professional in the fields of SEO and content writing. With a profound knowledge of the intricate aspects of these disciplines, Varun has established himself as a valuable asset in the world of digital marketing and online content creation.
Hypothesis testing in statistics involves testing an assumption about a population parameter using sample data. Learners can download Hypothesis Testing PDF to get instant access to all information!
What exactly is hypothesis testing, and how does it work in statistics? Can I find practical examples and understand the different types from this blog?
Hypothesis Testing : Ever wonder how researchers determine if a new medicine actually works or if a new marketing campaign effectively drives sales? They use hypothesis testing! It is at the core of how scientific studies, business experiments and surveys determine if their results are statistically significant or just due to chance.
Hypothesis testing allows us to make evidence-based decisions by quantifying uncertainty and providing a structured process to make data-driven conclusions rather than guessing. In this post, we will discuss hypothesis testing types, examples, and processes!
Table of Contents
Hypothesis testing is a statistical method used to evaluate the validity of a hypothesis using sample data. It involves assessing whether observed data provide enough evidence to reject a specific hypothesis about a population parameter.
Hypothesis testing in data science is a statistical method used to evaluate two mutually exclusive population statements based on sample data. The primary goal is to determine which statement is more supported by the observed data.
Hypothesis testing assists in supporting the certainty of findings in research and data science projects. This statistical inference aids in making decisions about population parameters using sample data. For those who are looking to deepen their knowledge in data science and expand their skillset, we highly recommend checking out Master Generative AI: Data Science Course by Physics Wallah .
Also Read: What is Encapsulation Explain in Details
The hypothesis testing procedure in data science involves a structured approach to evaluating hypotheses using statistical methods. Here’s a step-by-step breakdown of the typical procedure:
Also Read: Binary Search Algorithm
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental concept in statistics that aids analysts in making informed decisions based on sample data about a larger population. The process involves setting up two contrasting hypotheses, the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis, and then using statistical methods to determine which hypothesis provides a more plausible explanation for the observed data.
Once these hypotheses are established, analysts gather data from a sample and conduct statistical tests. The objective is to determine whether the observed results are statistically significant enough to reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative.
Hypothesis testing is a cornerstone in statistical analysis, providing a framework to evaluate the validity of assumptions or claims made about a population based on sample data. Within this framework, several specific tests are utilized based on the nature of the data and the question at hand. Here’s a closer look at the three fundamental types of hypothesis tests:
The z-test is a statistical method primarily employed when comparing means from two datasets, particularly when the population standard deviation is known. Its main objective is to ascertain if the means are statistically equivalent.
A crucial prerequisite for the z-test is that the sample size should be relatively large, typically 30 data points or more. This test aids researchers and analysts in determining the significance of a relationship or discovery, especially in scenarios where the data’s characteristics align with the assumptions of the z-test.
The t-test is a versatile statistical tool used extensively in research and various fields to compare means between two groups. It’s particularly valuable when the population standard deviation is unknown or when dealing with smaller sample sizes.
By evaluating the means of two groups, the t-test helps ascertain if a particular treatment, intervention, or variable significantly impacts the population under study. Its flexibility and robustness make it a go-to method in scenarios ranging from medical research to business analytics.
The Chi-Square test stands distinct from the previous tests, primarily focusing on categorical data rather than means. This statistical test is instrumental when analyzing categorical variables to determine if observed data aligns with expected outcomes as posited by the null hypothesis.
By assessing the differences between observed and expected frequencies within categorical data, the Chi-Square test offers insights into whether discrepancies are statistically significant. Whether used in social sciences to evaluate survey responses or in quality control to assess product defects, the Chi-Square test remains pivotal for hypothesis testing in diverse scenarios.
Also Read: Python vs Java: Which is Best for Machine learning algorithm
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental concept in statistics used to make decisions or inferences about a population based on a sample of data. The process involves setting up two competing hypotheses, the null hypothesis H 0 and the alternative hypothesis H 1.
Through various statistical tests, such as the t-test, z-test, or Chi-square test, analysts evaluate sample data to determine whether there’s enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative. The aim is to draw conclusions about population parameters or to test theories, claims, or hypotheses.
In research, hypothesis testing serves as a structured approach to validate or refute theories or claims. Researchers formulate a clear hypothesis based on existing literature or preliminary observations. They then collect data through experiments, surveys, or observational studies.
Using statistical methods, researchers analyze this data to determine if there’s sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis. By doing so, they can draw meaningful conclusions, make predictions, or recommend actions based on empirical evidence rather than mere speculation.
R, a powerful programming language and environment for statistical computing and graphics, offers a wide array of functions and packages specifically designed for hypothesis testing. Here’s how hypothesis testing is conducted in R:
Hypothesis testing is an integral part of statistics and research, offering a systematic approach to validate hypotheses. Leveraging R’s capabilities, researchers and analysts can efficiently conduct and interpret various hypothesis tests, ensuring robust and reliable conclusions from their data.
Yes, data scientists frequently engage in hypothesis testing as part of their analytical toolkit. Hypothesis testing is a foundational statistical technique used to make data-driven decisions, validate assumptions, and draw conclusions from data. Here’s how data scientists utilize hypothesis testing:
Let’s delve into some common examples of hypothesis testing and provide solutions or interpretations for each scenario.
Scenario : A coffee shop owner believes that the average waiting time for customers during peak hours is 5 minutes. To test this, the owner takes a random sample of 30 customer waiting times and wants to determine if the average waiting time is indeed 5 minutes.
Hypotheses :
Solution : Using a t-test (assuming population variance is unknown), calculate the t-statistic based on the sample mean, sample standard deviation, and sample size. Then, determine the p-value and compare it with a significance level (e.g., 0.05) to decide whether to reject the null hypothesis.
Scenario : An e-commerce company wants to determine if changing the color of a “Buy Now” button from blue to green increases the conversion rate.
Solution : Split website visitors into two groups: one sees the blue button (control group), and the other sees the green button (test group). Track the conversion rates for both groups over a specified period. Then, use a chi-square test or z-test (for large sample sizes) to determine if there’s a statistically significant difference in conversion rates between the two groups.
The formula for hypothesis testing typically depends on the type of test (e.g., z-test, t-test, chi-square test) and the nature of the data (e.g., mean, proportion, variance). Below are the basic formulas for some common hypothesis tests:
Z-Test for Population Mean :
Z=(σ/n)(xˉ−μ0)
T-Test for Population Mean :
t= (s/ n ) ( x ˉ −μ 0 )
s = Sample standard deviation
Chi-Square Test for Goodness of Fit :
χ2=∑Ei(Oi−Ei)2
Also Read: Full Form of OOPS
While you can perform hypothesis testing manually using the above formulas and statistical tables, many online tools and software packages simplify this process. Here’s how you might use a calculator or software:
When using any calculator or software, always ensure you understand the underlying assumptions of the test, interpret the results correctly, and consider the broader context of your research or analysis.
What are the key components of a hypothesis test.
The key components include: Null Hypothesis (H0): A statement of no effect or no difference. Alternative Hypothesis (H1 or Ha): A statement that contradicts the null hypothesis. Test Statistic: A value computed from the sample data to test the null hypothesis. Significance Level (α): The threshold for rejecting the null hypothesis. P-value: The probability of observing the given data, assuming the null hypothesis is true.
The significance level (often denoted as α) is the probability threshold used to determine whether to reject the null hypothesis. Commonly used values for α include 0.05, 0.01, and 0.10, representing a 5%, 1%, or 10% chance of rejecting the null hypothesis when it's actually true.
The choice between one-tailed and two-tailed tests depends on your research question and hypothesis. Use a one-tailed test when you're specifically interested in one direction of an effect (e.g., greater than or less than). Use a two-tailed test when you want to determine if there's a significant difference in either direction.
The p-value is a probability value that helps determine the strength of evidence against the null hypothesis. A low p-value (typically ≤ 0.05) suggests that the observed data is inconsistent with the null hypothesis, leading to its rejection. Conversely, a high p-value suggests that the data is consistent with the null hypothesis, leading to no rejection.
No, hypothesis testing cannot prove a hypothesis true. Instead, it helps assess the likelihood of observing a given set of data under the assumption that the null hypothesis is true. Based on this assessment, you either reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis.
System Design Interview: System design interviews are a crucial aspect of technical job interviews, especially for roles that involve building…
Statistician: If you love working with numbers and enjoy using statistical methods in real-life situations, then a career as a…
In today's data-driven world, enterprises face a massive influx of big data. To tackle this challenge, businesses are turning to…
Governments should invest in smaller pilots, hypothesis testing and co-development with vendors before committing to large production rollouts to avoid project failures.
Governments are increasingly scaling down large technology initiatives in favour of smaller incremental digital investments that are generally easier to manage and control. That’s because oversized or “big IT” government projects are often a common, systematic cause of failure.
These project failures have negative consequences that have proven detrimental both to government service delivery and building citizen trust. This is leading to greater project fatigue and greater scrutiny.
Earlier this year, an inquiry examining the Australian government’s attempts to privatise the visa processing system and deliver new IT systems in Home Affairs was recently expanded to examine public sector IT projects more broadly.
Similarly, the Digital Transformation Agency’s GovERP reuse assessment recommended “focusing on smaller-scale projects over shorter time limits may help minimise ERP uplift delivery risks.”
It’s also putting pressure on government organisations to seek more modern, nimble approaches. A Gartner survey found that 46% of government respondents periodically or regularly conduct small technology projects to ensure success and business value, while only 44% report similar investment in major technology projects.
So how can government IT leaders set up digital initiatives for success? Understanding the main causes of failure is a good starting point.
Project failures can often be attributed to an unwillingness or inability of senior government executives to engage in effective decision making. The “chief executive” is the person in the position of controlling all resources associated with the project, and often they aren’t as engaged as would be ideal. More often than not, the business or mission units aren't either during the development process.
Typically, this results in the project’s success not being adequately or reasonably defined, largely due to a lack of understanding of the project roadmap or what needs to occur for the release of a new product or feature to validate stakeholder needs and demands.
Often, poor IT investment decision-making processes get in the way. It could be that schedules or cost estimates haven’t been developed in a collaborative fashion or well understood by all stakeholders. These need to be accepted and managed by a project team that includes both the business units and the IT organisation.
In many cases, failure is a result of projects that are just overly large or ambitious. With massive change that is planned to be introduced via a “big bang” delivery, there is no incremental delivery. Success or failure is dependent on a classic boom and bust cycle.
In preparation for a project going live, the failure of government executives to take responsibility for change management is a real issue. This means stakeholders, whether internal or citizens, aren’t well prepared and can lead to push back on using government services. It also leads to business processes that are not examined properly or reworked in advance of applying technology.
Inadequate governance is another frequent cause of failure. The decision-making processes associated with the project are either too slow, not well informed or not authoritative. No project happens without having to make decisions and changes along the way and, although not particularly exciting, governance is critical to success.
The final significant risk area for projects relates to a lack of in-house talent. It can be a case of the tail wagging the dog where the technology vendors or service providers are the only people with adequate depth of knowledge to really understand what's happening.
To reduce the costs and political risks associated with large technology project failures, governments are adopting proven practices from other industries. This includes agile and incremental delivery, product management, as well as improved governance and change management.
Incremental delivery is a way to break a large project into smaller deliverables. Government organisations are looking to innovate mission capabilities through more iterative and collaborative ways. Failure might occur for an increment, but it’s found sooner and at a lower cost.
An essential aspect of change management is business process reengineering. Business processes have to be closely examined for bottlenecks, waste and inefficiencies, as there is little to no benefit in automating poor processes, and it may even do some harm.
Executive-level guidance is also critical to success, with a chief executive who knows the objectives and plan. It’s important they provide project management oversight with increased monitoring and scrutiny of larger digital investments. This also includes looking to innovate acquisition methods through smaller or incremental contract sizes.
Finally, disruptive technologies, such as generative AI , often have uncertain impacts on complex policy challenges. Governments should take new digital investment approaches by investing in smaller pilots, hypothesis testing and co-development engagements with vendors before committing to large production rollouts.
Arthur Mickoleit is director analyst at Gartner, advising public sector CIOs and technology leaders on digital transformation, public sector innovation, citizen services delivery and citizen experience
While California advances AI legislation targeting safety testing, the U.S. Senate will also have several AI bills on its plate ...
The next U.S. president will set the tone on tech issues such as AI regulation, data privacy and climate tech. This guide breaks ...
CIOs and IT leaders can play an important role in boosting tech talent retention. Learn how these strategies can motivate ...
Now hiring: At the intersection of AI and cybersecurity, career opportunities are emerging. Explore four new jobs that combine AI...
A new report from Google TAG suggests that Russia's APT29 is using vulnerability exploits first developed from spyware vendors to...
Artificial intelligence is improving how enterprises address security vulnerabilities, resulting in stronger security postures ...
Test scripts are the heart of any job in pyATS. Best practices for test scripts include proper structure, API integration and the...
Cloud and on-premises subnets use IP ranges, subnet masks or prefixes, and security policies. But cloud subnets are simpler to ...
Satellite connectivity lets Broadcom offer the VeloCloud SD-WAN as an option for linking IoT devices to the global network from ...
The Broadcom CEO said public cloud migration trauma can be cured by private cloud services like those from VMware, but VMware ...
New capabilities for VMware VCF can import and manage existing VMware services through a single console interface for a private ...
Due to rapid AI hardware advancement, companies are releasing advanced products yearly to keep up with the competition. The new ...
The observability specialist's latest financing, along with strong recurring revenue and customer growth, helps set the vendor up...
Serverless, first launched on AWS, is now available on all three major public clouds in a move aimed at enabling customers to ...
Implementing a data governance strategy requires a roadmap to keep everyone on track and overcome challenges. Follow eight key ...
We introduce a projection-based test for assessing logistic regression models using the empirical residual marked empirical process and suggest a model-based bootstrap procedure to calculate critical values. We comprehensively compare this test and Stute and Zhu’s test with several commonly used goodness-of-fit (GoF) tests: the Hosmer–Lemeshow test, modified Hosmer–Lemeshow test, Osius–Rojek test, and Stukel test for logistic regression models in terms of type I error control and power performance in small ( \(n=50\) ), moderate ( \(n=100\) ), and large ( \(n=500\) ) sample sizes. We assess the power performance for two commonly encountered situations: nonlinear and interaction departures from the null hypothesis. All tests except the modified Hosmer–Lemeshow test and Osius–Rojek test have the correct size in all sample sizes. The power performance of the projection based test consistently outperforms its competitors. We apply these tests to analyze an AIDS dataset and a cancer dataset. For the former, all tests except the projection-based test do not reject a simple linear function in the logit, which has been illustrated to be deficient in the literature. For the latter dataset, the Hosmer–Lemeshow test, modified Hosmer–Lemeshow test, and Osius–Rojek test fail to detect the quadratic form in the logit, which was detected by the Stukel test, Stute and Zhu’s test, and the projection-based test.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Subscribe and save.
Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Rent this article via DeepDyve
Institutional subscriptions
Explore related subjects.
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
Chen, K., Hu, I., Ying, Z.: Strong consistency of maximum quasi-likelihood estimators in generalized linear models with fixed and adaptive designs. Ann. Stat. 27 (4), 1155–1163 (1999)
Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
Dardis, C.: LogisticDx: diagnostic tests and plots for logistic regression models. R package version 0.3 (2022)
Dikta, G., Kvesic, M., Schmidt, C.: Bootstrap approximations in model checks for binary data. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 101 , 521–530 (2006)
Ekanem, I.A., Parkin, D.M.: Five year cancer incidence in Calabar, Nigeria (2009–2013). Cancer Epidemiol. 42 , 167–172 (2016)
Article Google Scholar
Escanciano, J.C.: A consistent diagnostic test for regression models using projections. Economet. Theor. 22 , 1030–1051 (2006)
Härdle, W., Mammen, E., Müller, M.: Testing parametric versus semiparametric modeling in generalized linear models. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 93 , 1461–1474 (1998)
MathSciNet Google Scholar
Harrell, F.E.: rms: Regression modeling strategies. R package version 6.3-0 (2022)
Hosmer, D.W., Hjort, N.L.: Goodness-of-fit processes for logistic regression: simulation results. Stat. Med. 21 (18), 2723–2738 (2002)
Hosmer, D.W., Lemesbow, S.: Goodness of fit tests for the multiple logistic regression model. Commun Stat Theory Methods 9 , 1043–1069 (1980)
Hosmer, D.W., Hosmer, T., Le Cessie, S., Lemeshow, S.: A comparison of goodness-of-fit tests for the logistic regression model. Stat. Med. 16 (9), 965–980 (1997)
Hosmer, D., Lemeshow, S., Sturdivant, R.: Applied Logistic Regression. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, Wiley, New York (2013)
Book Google Scholar
Jones, L.K.: On a conjecture of Huber concerning the convergence of projection pursuit regression. Ann. Stat. 15 , 880–882 (1987)
Kohl, M.: MKmisc: miscellaneous functions from M. Kohl. R package version, vol. 1, p. 8 (2021)
Kosorok, M.R.: Introduction to Empirical Processes and Semiparametric Inference, vol. 61. Springer, New York (2008)
Lee, S.-M., Tran, P.-L., Li, C.-S.: Goodness-of-fit tests for a logistic regression model with missing covariates. Stat. Methods Med. Res. 31 , 1031–1050 (2022)
Lindsey, J.K.: Applying Generalized Linear Models. Springer, Berlin (2000)
McCullagh, P., Nelder, J.A.: Generalized Linear Models, vol. 37. Chapman and Hall (1989)
Nelder, J.A., Wedderburn, R.W.M.: Generalized linear models. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A 135 , 370–384 (1972)
Oguntunde, P.E., Adejumo, A.O., Okagbue, H.I.: Breast cancer patients in Nigeria: data exploration approach. Data Brief 15 , 47 (2017)
Osius, G., Rojek, D.: Normal goodness-of-fit tests for multinomial models with large degrees of freedom. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 87 (420), 1145–1152 (1992)
Rady, E.-H.A., Abonazel, M.R., Metawe’e, M.H.: A comparison study of goodness of fit tests of logistic regression in R: simulation and application to breast cancer data. Appl. Math. Sci. 7 , 50–59 (2021)
Google Scholar
Stukel, T.A.: Generalized logistic models. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 83 (402), 426–431 (1988)
Stute, W., Zhu, L.-X.: Model checks for generalized linear models. Scand. J. Stat. Theory Appl. 29 , 535–545 (2002)
van der Vaart, A.W., Wellner, J.A.: Weak Convergence and Empirical Processes. Springer (1996)
van Heel, M., Dikta, G., Braekers, R.: Bootstrap based goodness-of-fit tests for binary multivariate regression models. J. Korean Stat. Soc. 51 (1), 308–335 (2022)
Yin, C., Zhao, L., Wei, C.: Asymptotic normality and strong consistency of maximum quasi-likelihood estimates in generalized linear models. Sci. China Ser. A Math. 49 , 145–157 (2006)
Download references
Li’s research was partially supported by NNSFC grant 11871294. Härdle gratefully acknowledges support through the European Cooperation in Science & Technology COST Action grant CA19130 - Fintech and Artificial Intelligence in Finance - Towards a transparent financial industry; the project “IDA Institute of Digital Assets”, CF166/15.11.2022, contract number CN760046/ 23.05.2024 financed under the Romanias National Recovery and Resilience Plan, Apel nr. PNRR-III-C9-2022-I8; and the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions under the European Union’s Horizon Europe research and innovation program for the Industrial Doctoral Network on Digital Finance, acronym DIGITAL, Project No. 101119635
Authors and affiliations.
Department of Statistics, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
Huiling Liu
School of Mathematics and Statistics, Qingdao University, Shandong, 266071, China
Center for Statistics and Data Science, Beijing Normal University, Zhuhai, 519087, China
Feifei Chen
BRC Blockchain Research Center, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10178, Berlin, Germany
Wolfgang Härdle
Dept Information Management and Finance, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung U, Hsinchu, Taiwan
IDA Institute Digital Assets, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania
Department of Statistics, George Washington University, Washington, DC, 20052, USA
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
LHL, LXM and LH wrote the main manuscript text, LHL and CFF program, HW commented on the methodological section. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Correspondence to Hua Liang .
Competing interests.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher's note.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Reprints and permissions
Liu, H., Li, X., Chen, F. et al. A comprehensive comparison of goodness-of-fit tests for logistic regression models. Stat Comput 34 , 175 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-024-10487-5
Download citation
Received : 02 December 2023
Accepted : 19 August 2024
Published : 30 August 2024
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-024-10487-5
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Hypothesis testing is a formal procedure for investigating our ideas about the world using statistics. It is most often used by scientists to test specific predictions, called hypotheses, that arise from theories.
Hypothesis testing is a scientific method used for making a decision and drawing conclusions by using a statistical approach. It is used to suggest new ideas by testing theories to know whether or not the sample data supports research. A research hypothesis is a predictive statement that has to be tested using scientific methods that join an ...
This article shares several examples of hypothesis testing in real life situations.
23.1 How Hypothesis Tests Are Reported in the News Determine the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis. Collect and summarize the data into a test statistic. Use the test statistic to determine the p-value. The result is statistically significant if the p-value is less than or equal to the level of significance.
In this article, I want to show hypothesis testing with Python on several questions step-by-step. But before, let me explain the hypothesis testing process briefly. If you wish, you can move to the questions directly.
However, in this tutorial, we will learn from the first principles. This will be an example-driven tutorial where we start with a basic example and build our way up to understand the foundations of hypothesis testing.
Hypothesis Testing Hypothesis Tests, or Statistical Hypothesis Testing, is a technique used to compare two datasets, or a sample from a dataset. It is a statistical inference method so, in the end of the test, you'll draw a conclusion — you'll infer something — about the characteristics of what you're comparing.
The test statistic t * is 1.22, and the P -value is 0.117. If the engineer set his significance level α at 0.05 and used the critical value approach to conduct his hypothesis test, he would reject the null hypothesis if his test statistic t * were greater than 1.7109 (determined using statistical software or a t -table):
What is Hypothesis Testing? Hypothesis testing in statistics uses sample data to infer the properties of a whole population. These tests determine whether a random sample provides sufficient evidence to conclude an effect or relationship exists in the population. Researchers use them to help separate genuine population-level effects from false effects that random chance can create in samples ...
A hypothesis is a statement that can be tested by scientific research. If you want to test a relationship between two or more variables, you need to write hypotheses before you start your experiment or data collection.
Hypothesis testing is a technique that helps scientists, researchers, or for that matter, anyone test the validity of their claims or hypotheses about real-world or real-life events in order to establish new knowledge. Hypothesis testing techniques are often used in statistics and data science to analyze whether the claims about the occurrence of the events are true, whether the results ...
The hypothesis testing broadly involves the following steps, Step 1: Formulate the research hypothesis and the null hypothesis of the experiment. Step 2: Set the characteristics of the comparison distribution. Step3: Set the criterion for decision making, i.e., cut off sample score for the comparison to reject or retain the null hypothesis.
Learn how to conduct full hypothesis tests with examples and graphs. Apply the four-step process to different scenarios and interpret the results.
Hypothesis testing, then, is a statistical means of testing an assumption stated in a hypothesis. While the specific methodology leveraged depends on the nature of the hypothesis and data available, hypothesis testing typically uses sample data to extrapolate insights about a larger population.
A hypothesis is a prediction of the outcome of a test. It forms the basis for designing an experiment in the scientific method. A good hypothesis is testable, meaning it makes a prediction you can check with observation or experimentation. Here are different hypothesis examples.
ition cost of a 4-yr. public college. Since I will soon be transferring to a 4-yr. college, I thought this topic would be perfect. "The College Board" says that the average tuition cost of college is $5836 per year. I will be researching online the costs of different public colleges to test this claim. I will be using the T-test for a mean, since my sample is going to be less than 30 and an ...
Explore hypothesis testing, a fundamental method in data analysis. Understand how to use it to draw accurate conclusions and make informed decisions.
When writing the conclusion of a hypothesis test, we typically include: Whether we reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis. The significance level. A short explanation in the context of the hypothesis test. For example, we would write: We reject the null hypothesis at the 5% significance level.
Hypothesis testing is a common statistical tool used in research and data science to support the certainty of findings. The aim of testing is to answer how probable an apparent effect is detected by chance given a random data sample. This article provides a detailed explanation of the key concepts in Frequentist hypothesis testing using problems from the business domain as examples.
A hypothesis is a statement that can be tested by scientific research. If you want to test a relationship between two or more variables, you need to write hypotheses before you start your experiment or data collection. Example: Hypothesis
Hypothesis testing allows us to make evidence-based decisions by quantifying uncertainty and providing a structured process to make data-driven conclusions rather than guessing. In this post, we will discuss hypothesis testing types, examples, and processes!
Use this guide to learn how to write a hypothesis and read successful and unsuccessful examples of a testable hypotheses.
The hypothesis is an educated, testable prediction about what will happen. Make it clear. A good hypothesis is written in clear and simple language. Reading your hypothesis should tell a teacher or judge exactly what you thought was going to happen when you started your project. Keep the variables in mind.
Governments should invest in smaller pilots, hypothesis testing and co-development with vendors before committing to large production rollouts to avoid project failures
We assess the power performance for two commonly encountered situations: nonlinear and interaction departures from the null hypothesis. All tests except the modified Hosmer-Lemeshow test and Osius-Rojek test have the correct size in all sample sizes. The power performance of the projection based test consistently outperforms its competitors.