essay about democracy in urdu

آسان ٹیکنالوجی

جمہوریت پر مضمون.

جمہوریت، حکمرانی کی ایک شکل کے طور پر، پوری تاریخ میں اہم تبدیلیوں سے گزری ہے۔ قدیم یونان میں اس کی ابتدا سے لے کر اس کے جدید دور کے مظاہر تک، جمہوریت مسلسل ترقی کرتی رہی ہے، بدلتے ہوئے معاشروں، ٹیکنالوجیز اور عالمی حرکیات کے مطابق ہوتی ہے۔ جمہوریت پر مضمون ، جمہوریت کی کثیر جہتی نوعیت کی کھوج کرتا ہے، اس کے بنیادی اصولوں، اس کی طاقتوں اور کمزوریوں، اور ایک منصفانہ معاشرے کی تشکیل کے لیے اس کے امکانات کا جائزہ لیتا ہے۔ تاریخی مثالوں اور عصری چیلنجوں کا جائزہ لے کر، ہم تجزیہ کرتے ہیں کہ جمہوریت کس طرح شہریوں کو بااختیار بناتی ہے، سماجی ترقی کو فروغ دیتی ہے، اور نظامی عدم مساوات کو دور کرتی ہے۔ مزید برآں، ہم تکنیکی ترقی کے اثرات، پاپولزم کے عروج، اور جمہوری نظریات کو برقرار رکھنے میں شہری مشغولیت کی اہمیت کو تلاش کرتے ہیں۔

جمہوریت کی تعریف

جمہوریت حکمرانی کا ایک ایسا نظام ہے جس میں طاقت عوام کو دی جاتی ہے، جس سے وہ فیصلہ سازی میں حصہ لیتے ہیں اور اپنے نمائندوں کو جوابدہ ٹھہراتے ہیں۔

جمہوریت ایک ایسا تصور ہے جو آزادی، مساوات اور انصاف کے لیے انسانیت کی اجتماعی امنگوں میں گہری جڑی ہوئی ہے۔ یہ نظم و نسق کے ایک ایسے نظام کی نمائندگی کرتا ہے جو ہر فرد کی موروثی قدر اور ایجنسی کو تسلیم کرتا ہے، انہیں اپنی تقدیر خود تشکیل دینے اور ان کی زندگیوں کو متاثر کرنے والے فیصلہ سازی کے عمل میں حصہ ڈالنے کا اختیار دیتا ہے۔ جمہوریت کے اصولوں میں عوامی خودمختاری، سیاسی شرکت، قانون کی حکمرانی، انسانی حقوق کا تحفظ اور تکثیریت شامل ہیں۔ جمہوریت کی تاریخی ترقی، اس کے بنیادی عناصر، طاقتوں، کمزوریوں اور چیلنجوں کا جائزہ لے کر، یہ مضمون ایک منصفانہ معاشرے کو فروغ دینے میں جمہوریت کی تبدیلی کی صلاحیت کو روشن کرنے کی کوشش کرتا ہے۔

جمہوریت کی تاریخی ترقی

جمہوریت کی پیدائش کا پتہ قدیم یونان سے لگایا جا سکتا ہے، جہاں فیصلہ سازی میں شہریوں کی براہ راست شرکت کا تصور سامنے آیا۔ ایتھنائی ماڈل، جبکہ مراعات یافتہ چند افراد تک محدود تھا، جمہوری نظریات کی بنیاد رکھی جو بعد میں پوری دنیا کے سیاسی مفکرین اور انقلابیوں کو متاثر کرے گی۔ روشن خیالی کے دور اور انقلابات کے بعد کے دور نے نمائندہ جمہوریت کے عروج کا مشاہدہ کیا، جس کا مقصد حکومتوں کو اپنے شہریوں کے سامنے جوابدہ بنانا تھا۔ وقت گزرنے کے ساتھ ساتھ، جمہوریت ترقی اور وسعت اختیار کرتی گئی، جس نے تیزی سے ایک دوسرے سے جڑی ہوئی اور پیچیدہ دنیا کے تقاضوں کا جواب دیا۔

یہ بھی پڑھیں: عید الفطر پر مضمون

جمہوریت کے بنیادی عناصر

جمہوریت کے مرکز میں عوامی حاکمیت کا اصول ہے، جو اس بات پر زور دیتا ہے کہ حتمی سیاسی طاقت عوام کے پاس ہے۔ سیاسی شرکت، جو انتخابات، ریفرنڈم، اور شہری مصروفیت کے ذریعے ظاہر ہوتی ہے، شہریوں کو اپنی ایجنسی کو استعمال کرنے اور فیصلہ سازی کے عمل کو متاثر کرنے کے قابل بناتی ہے۔ قانون کی حکمرانی، انسانی حقوق کے تحفظ کے ساتھ ساتھ، اس بات کو یقینی بناتی ہے کہ جمہوری نظام انفرادی آزادیوں کا تحفظ کرتے ہیں اور سماجی تعامل کے لیے ایک منصفانہ فریم ورک فراہم کرتے ہیں۔ مزید یہ کہ جمہوریت تکثیریت کی بنیاد پر پنپتی ہے، تنوع کا جشن منانا، شمولیت کو فروغ دینا، اور مختلف نقطہ نظر کا احترام کرنا۔

جمہوریت کی طاقت اور فوائد

جمہوریت کی بنیادی طاقتوں میں سے ایک انفرادی آزادیوں کے تحفظ کے عزم میں پنہاں ہے۔ آئینی ضمانتوں اور آزاد عدالتی نظام کے ذریعے جمہوریت شہریوں کو اپنی رائے دینے، اختلاف رائے کا اظہار کرنے اور حکومتوں کو جوابدہ ٹھہرانے کا پلیٹ فارم فراہم کرتی ہے۔ مزید برآں، جمہوریت نے سماجی مساوات کو آگے بڑھانے، شہری حقوق کی تحریکوں کو فروغ دینے، اور نظامی امتیاز کو چیلنج کرنے میں اہم کردار ادا کیا ہے۔ اقتصادی طور پر، جمہوری معاشروں نے جدت، کاروبار، اور پائیدار ترقی کی اعلیٰ سطحوں کا مظاہرہ کیا ہے۔

جمہوریت کے چیلنجز اور کمزوریاں

اپنی بہت سی طاقتوں کے باوجود، جمہوریت کو عصری دنیا میں زبردست چیلنجز کا سامنا ہے۔ جمہوری اداروں کو لاحق خطرات، جیسے آمریت، بدعنوانی، اور جمہوری اصولوں کا کٹاؤ، نمایاں خطرات لاحق ہیں۔ سماجی و اقتصادی اضطراب اور سیاسی پولرائزیشن کی وجہ سے پاپولزم کے عروج نے جمہوری نظاموں کی لچک کا امتحان لیا ہے۔ مزید برآں، قوموں کے اندر اور دونوں کے درمیان عدم مساوات برقرار ہے، جمہوری طرز حکمرانی کے لیے مزید جامع نقطہ نظر کی ضرورت کو اجاگر کرتی ہے۔

ڈیجیٹل دور میں جمہوریت

ڈیجیٹل دور کی آمد نے جمہوریت کے لیے نئے مواقع اور چیلنجز کا آغاز کیا ہے۔ تکنیکی ترقی نے معلومات تک رسائی میں اضافہ کیا ہے، جس سے شہریوں کو زیادہ باخبر رہنے اور مشغول ہونے کے قابل بنایا گیا ہے۔ ای گورننس کے اقدامات شفافیت، کارکردگی اور فیصلہ سازی میں شہریوں کی شرکت کو بڑھانے کی صلاحیت رکھتے ہیں۔ تاہم، ڈیجیٹل دور خطرات بھی پیش کرتا ہے، بشمول غلط معلومات کا پھیلاؤ، رازداری کو لاحق خطرات، اور ڈیجیٹل تقسیم۔ ان چیلنجز کے پیش نظر جمہوری اقدار کا تحفظ انتہائی ضروری ہے۔

شہری مشغولیت اور فعال شہریت کو فروغ دینا

ایک پروان چڑھتی جمہوریت کے لیے فعال شہریوں کی شمولیت کی ضرورت ہوتی ہے۔ تعلیم اور میڈیا کی خواندگی ایک باخبر شہری پیدا کرنے میں اہم کردار ادا کرتی ہے جو معلومات کا تنقیدی تجزیہ کرنے اور تعمیری مکالمے میں مشغول ہونے کے قابل ہو۔ نچلی سطح کی تحریکیں اور سول سوسائٹی کی تنظیمیں سماجی تبدیلی اور وکالت کے لیے ضروری اتپریرک کے طور پر کام کرتی ہیں۔ نوجوانوں کی شرکت اور نسلی مکالمے جمہوریت کے مستقبل کی تشکیل کے لیے لازم و ملزوم ہیں۔

ڈیموکریٹک گورننس اور عالمی تعاون

جمہوریت صرف قومی حدود تک محدود نہیں ہے۔ اقوام متحدہ جیسی بین الاقوامی تنظیمیں عالمی سطح پر جمہوری اقدار کو فروغ دینے میں اہم کردار ادا کرتی ہیں۔ جمہوری طرز حکمرانی کے ذریعے عالمی چیلنجوں بشمول ماحولیاتی تبدیلی، غربت اور تنازعات سے نمٹنے کے ذریعے، قومیں تعاون، شمولیت اور امن کو فروغ دے سکتی ہیں۔ جمہوریت سرحدوں کو عبور کرتی ہے اور جمہوری اصولوں کو برقرار رکھنے کے لیے پرعزم قوموں کے درمیان یکجہتی کا مطالبہ کرتی ہے۔

جمہوریت کا مستقبل

جیسے جیسے معاشرے ترقی کرتے ہیں، اسی طرح جمہوری اداروں کا بھی ہونا چاہیے۔ بدلتی ہوئی معاشرتی ضروریات کے مطابق ڈھالنے کے لیے مسلسل عکاسی، اختراع اور دوبارہ ایجاد کی ضرورت ہوتی ہے۔ جمہوریتوں کو متعلقہ اور موثر رہنے کے لیے نمائندگی، شمولیت، اور سماجی انصاف کے مسائل کو فعال طور پر حل کرنا چاہیے۔ ان کے منفی اثرات سے بچتے ہوئے تکنیکی ترقی کو اپنانا ناگزیر ہے۔ جامع اور شراکتی جمہوریت کے لیے جدوجہد اس بات کو یقینی بناتی ہے کہ کوئی فرد یا گروہ ایک منصفانہ اور مساوی معاشرے کے حصول میں پیچھے نہ رہے۔

جمہوریت کی خوبیاں

جمہوریت امید اور ترقی کی ایک کرن کے طور پر کھڑی ہے، جمہوریت بہت سارے فوائد پیش کرتی ہے جس نے حکمرانی کی سب سے معزز شکلوں میں سے ایک کے طور پر اس کی پوزیشن کو مستحکم کیا ہے۔ اس کی سب سے بڑی طاقت اپنے شہریوں میں بااختیار بنانے اور شمولیت کے احساس کو فروغ دینے میں مضمر ہے۔ ہر اہل فرد کو آزادانہ اور منصفانہ انتخابات کے ذریعے فیصلہ سازی کے عمل میں حصہ لینے کا حق دے کر، جمہوریت اس بات کو یقینی بناتی ہے کہ قوم کے مستقبل کی تشکیل میں عوام کی آوازیں سنی جائیں اور ان پر غور کیا جائے۔ مزید برآں، جمہوریت سرکاری اداروں میں شفافیت اور جوابدہی کو فروغ دیتی ہے، کیونکہ رہنما ووٹر کے سامنے جوابدہ ہوتے ہیں اور باقاعدہ جانچ پڑتال کے تابع ہوتے ہیں۔ مزید برآں، جمہوری معاشرے زیادہ مستحکم اور پرامن ہوتے ہیں، کیونکہ طاقت کو طاقت یا جبر کے بجائے پرامن طریقے سے انتخابات کے ذریعے منتقل کیا جاتا ہے۔ مزید برآں، جمہوریت بنیادی انسانی حقوق کے تحفظ کی حوصلہ افزائی کرتی ہے، سماجی انصاف اور سب کے لیے مساوات کو فروغ دیتی ہے۔ سیاسی مسابقت، آزادی اظہار، اور ایک متحرک سول سوسائٹی کی حوصلہ افزائی کرکے، جمہوریت اختراع، تخلیقی صلاحیتوں اور سماجی ترقی کو تحریک دیتی ہے۔ جمہوریت کے یہ فوائد اجتماعی طور پر ایک زیادہ جامع، خوشحال اور ہم آہنگ معاشرے میں حصہ ڈالتے ہیں، جو اسے دنیا بھر میں طرز حکمرانی کا ایک ترجیحی انتخاب بناتے ہیں۔

جمہوریت کے نقصانات

اگرچہ جمہوریت کے بے شمار فوائد ہیں، لیکن یہ اپنی خامیوں اور چیلنجوں کے بغیر نہیں ہے۔ ایک اہم نقصان نااہلی اور فیصلہ سازی کے سست عمل کی صلاحیت میں ہے۔ جمہوری نظاموں میں، اتفاق رائے تک پہنچنے کے لیے اکثر وقت گزاری بحثوں اور مذاکرات کی ضرورت ہوتی ہے، جو فوری مسائل کے لیے فوری ردعمل میں رکاوٹ بن سکتی ہے۔ مزید برآں، انتخابی نتائج کی غیرمتوقعیت قیادت میں بار بار تبدیلیوں کا باعث بن سکتی ہے، جس کے نتیجے میں پالیسی میں عدم استحکام اور عدم مطابقت پیدا ہوتی ہے۔ مزید برآں، عوامی حمایت کے حصول میں، سیاست دان پاپولزم کا سہارا لے سکتے ہیں اور ایسے وعدے کر سکتے ہیں جنہیں وہ ممکنہ طور پر پورا نہیں کر سکتے، جس سے طویل مدت میں مایوسی اور عوامی عدم اعتماد پیدا ہوتا ہے۔ جمہوری عمل ہیرا پھیری اور غلط معلومات کے لیے بھی حساس ہو سکتا ہے، کیونکہ جعلی خبروں اور پروپیگنڈے کا پھیلاؤ رائے عامہ کو متاثر کر سکتا ہے اور انتخابات کو متاثر کر سکتا ہے۔ مزید برآں، اکثریت کے جبر کا خطرہ ہے، جہاں اقلیتی گروہوں کے مفادات اکثریت کی مرضی کے زیر سایہ یا نظر انداز ہو سکتے ہیں۔ یہ نقصانات جمہوریت کی پیچیدگی کو واضح کرتے ہیں، اس کی خامیوں کو دور کرنے اور اس کے اصولوں کو مؤثر طریقے سے برقرار رکھنے کے لیے مستقل چوکسی، تعلیم اور شراکتی شہریت کی ضرورت ہوتی ہے۔

جمہوریت امید اور ترقی کی ایک کرن کے طور پر کھڑی ہے، شہریوں کو بااختیار بناتی ہے اور اجتماعی بہبود کو فروغ دیتی ہے۔ اس کی تاریخی رفتار چیلنجوں کے مقابلہ میں جمہوری نظریات کی لچک اور موافقت کو نمایاں کرتی ہے۔ اس کی کمزوریوں کو تسلیم کرکے اور ان کا ازالہ کرکے، شہری مشغولیت کو فروغ دے کر، ڈیجیٹل ٹیکنالوجیز کی صلاحیت کو اپناتے ہوئے، اور عالمی تعاون کو فروغ دے کر، ہم جمہوریت کی مکمل تبدیلی کی طاقت کو بے نقاب کر سکتے ہیں۔ افراد، برادریوں اور قوموں کی اجتماعی کوششوں سے ہی ہم ایک ایسے مستقبل کی تعمیر کر سکتے ہیں جہاں جمہوریت پروان چڑھے، انصاف، مساوات اور سب کے لیے وقار کو یقینی بنائے۔

یہ بھی پڑھیں: سیاست پر مضمون – تعریف، اہداف و مقاصد اور کردار

اگر آپ کو جمہوریت پر مضمون پسند آیا ہے تو اپنے دوستوں کے ساتھ سوشل میڈیا پر ضرور شئیر کریں۔ مزید اردو مضامین کے لئے ہمارے ویب سائٹ کو ضرور سبسکرائب کریں۔

About Admin

Democracy in Pakistan Essay with Quotations

by Pakiology | Aug 22, 2024 | Essay | 1 comment

Explore the evolution, challenges, and progress of democracy in Pakistan in this in-depth essay . Gain insights into the nation’s rich history, the influence of the military, the pervasive issue of corruption, and the role of civil society in shaping Pakistan’s democratic landscape.

Title: The Evolution of Democracy in Pakistan: Challenges, Progress, and Prospects for the Future

Introduction.

Pakistan, a country characterized by its rich and diverse history, has embarked on a tumultuous journey in pursuit of democracy. Overcoming numerous obstacles, its citizens have tenaciously defended their democratic rights and worked diligently to forge a more equitable society. In this comprehensive essay, we delve into the current state of democracy in Pakistan, recognizing its historical context, addressing the persistent challenges it confronts, highlighting the progress made, and considering the prospects for the future.

The Historical Landscape

Democracy, at its core, is a system of government grounded in the principle of representation, allowing citizens to actively participate in decision-making processes that impact their lives. Regrettably, the implementation of democracy in Pakistan has been marred by a series of military coups and periods of martial law, intermittently disrupting its democratic trajectory. Despite these adversities, Pakistan now operates as a federal parliamentary republic with a president and prime minister at the helm.

The Military’s Influence: A Persistent Challenge

A major impediment to democracy in Pakistan has been the enduring influence of the military on the political landscape. Pakistan’s history is replete with instances of military interventions in civilian governance, including several coups and martial law declarations. This persistent interference not only undermines democratic principles but also erodes public trust in the democratic system. Additionally, intelligence agencies have faced accusations of wielding substantial influence in the political sphere, further eroding democratic institutions and processes.

Corruption as a Hindrance: A Deep-Seated Issue

Another significant challenge is the pervasiveness of corruption within Pakistan. Corruption has become deeply ingrained in the country, with numerous politicians and government officials implicated in embezzlement and bribery. This deeply rooted issue corrodes the legitimacy of the democratic process and erodes public trust in the government. The adverse effects of corruption are most acutely felt by marginalized communities, who suffer from a lack of essential public services and resources.

The Resilience of Democratic Aspirations: Signs of Progress

Despite these formidable challenges, the citizens of Pakistan persistently strive to defend their democratic rights and fortify democratic institutions. In recent years, the country has seen a notable rise in the number of civil society organizations dedicated to advocating for transparency, accountability, and the promotion of awareness regarding democratic rights and freedoms. Additionally, the media has played a pivotal role in promoting democratic values and holding the government accountable for its actions.

The Role of Civil Society

Civil society organizations have emerged as vital agents of change in Pakistan’s democratic landscape. They tirelessly work to bridge the gap between the government and the governed, acting as watchdogs for accountability and transparency. Through advocacy, awareness campaigns, and public mobilization, these organizations have managed to shine a spotlight on the pressing issues of democracy and governance in Pakistan. Their activities range from monitoring elections to exposing corruption and advocating for the rule of law.

Media as the Fourth Estate

The media in Pakistan has undergone a transformational journey, evolving into a vibrant fourth estate that plays a crucial role in promoting democratic values. While media outlets often grapple with challenges such as censorship and intimidation, they continue to serve as a check on government power and a forum for diverse voices. Investigative journalism has uncovered corruption scandals, challenged authoritarianism, and provided a platform for citizens to engage in political discourse.

In conclusion, democracy in Pakistan remains an imperfect yet indispensable system, despite the numerous setbacks and challenges it has encountered. The people of Pakistan ardently safeguard their democratic rights, and the fortification of democratic institutions and processes is pivotal for the nation’s future. The enduring challenges posed by military influence, corruption, and public mistrust can only be surmounted through persistent efforts and sustained citizen engagement in the democratic process. As Pakistan continues its journey towards a more robust democracy, the world watches with hope and anticipation, recognizing the nation’s potential to overcome its challenges and achieve democratic excellence. The path may be long and arduous, but the resilience and determination of Pakistan’s people offer a promising outlook for the future of democracy in the country.

Quotes Related to Democracy

Here are a few quotes related to democracy and its challenges in Pakistan:

“A society that puts equality before freedom will get neither. A society that puts freedom before equality will get a high degree of both.” – Milton Friedman, Economist

“The greatest threat to democracy is not the enemies from without, but the enemies from within.” – Thomas Jefferson, Third President of the United States

“I believe that the real solution to the problems facing Pakistan lies in true democracy and the rule of law.” – Imran Khan, Former Prime Minister of Pakistan

“The price of freedom is eternal vigilance.” – John Philpot Curran, Irish Orator and Statesman.

Ask Your Questions

You might like, islamophobia css essay – understanding, addressing, overcoming.

Islamophobia is a growing problem in many parts of the world. It refers to the fear, hatred, or discrimination against...

My Favourite Personality Essay | 400 & 600 Words

Essay 1 (400 Words) : My Favourite Personality Is My Mother My favourite personality is my mother. She is kind,...

Why I Love Pakistan Essay | 400, 500 & 700 Words

400 Words Essay on Why I Love Pakistan With Quotation Pakistan is a country full of diversity and richness in culture,...

Problems of Karachi Essay | 200 & 500 Words

Explore the multifaceted challenges faced by Karachi in this comprehensive essay. From overpopulation to traffic...

Sir you have used a lot of bitter words in this essay which are enough to awake a nation.😭😭😭😭 But It’s reality I think inshallah one day we will achieve that original democracy which will prevent our basic rights and our motherland…..

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Submit Comment

class-9-notes
Friendship quotes
Scholarships
Science News
Study Abroad
Study in Australia
SZABMU MDCAT
UHS Past MCQs
Universities

Pakistan/Current Affairs
ISLAMIC STUDIES
International Relations
Gender Studies
Afghanistan
Climate Change
Foreign policy
Globalisation
War on Terror
BOOKS REVIEWS

Russia-Ukraine, China-Taiwan; An attempt for Unipolar World Order

Changing regional dynamics and pakistan, aurat azadi march: they should fight for equity not equality, why pakistan can’t recognize israel, has pakistan shifted its foreign policy from geo-politics to geo-economics, democracy in pakistan: hopes and hurdles.

Successive events and activities have taken place that make it crystal clear that there are hopes as well as hurdles in the way of democracy in Pakistan. One the one hand, the imposition of martial law by the military has become a distant dream now. Democratic leaders have turned mature. The democratic governments have not only shown distinguish performance, but also smoothly transferred power to another government as per election results for the first time in the history of Pakistan. The ECP has also improved its performance and the citizens have become aware of their rights to rule. These all events have created hopes for the democracy in Pakistan. One the other hand, indirect military interference in the democratic governments, feudal lord system, corruption of democratic leaders, poor literacy rate and ailing economy of the country, these all events act as hurdles in the way of democracy in Pakistan. Thus, it is established that the democracy in Pakistan encounters both hopes and hurdles.

Since the creation of Pakistan in 1947, democracy in the country has been witnessing both hopes and hurdles. The founder of Pakistan, Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah was keen to introduce democratic system in Pakistan. However, his sudden death impeded its proper imposition. Liaquat Ali Khan, afterward, carried the vision of Jinnah, but he also failed to give it a practical shape. Imposition of martial law by dictator Ayub khan closed all the door of democracy. Zulifqar ali Bhuttto appeared on the political screen and injected a new blood of hope for democracy in Pakistan. He pressurized General Yahya to hold elections. Consequently, he won the elections with a great margin in the West Pakistan and took an oath as the first democratic leader of the country. However, the hope could not sustained for a long time as General Zia imposed martial law and blocked the road of democratic progress. After Zia, democracy was seen, but it remained fragile and weak and gave green signal to another dictator General Pervez Musharraf, who ruled till 2008. After Musharraf, the democracy in Pakistan has been witnessing good days because it continues till today without any hurdle. Hence, Democracy in Pakistan witnessed both hopes and hurdles in Past.

A major hope for democracy in Pakistan lies in the fact the military will not come forward to impose its direct rule by dismantling the democratic system, as it did in past, because of two major reasons: Firstly, the military government is not recognized by the international community and is subject to various economic sanctions. Pakistan, is currently in the process of development because of the initiation of CPEC, cannot afford sanctions at this critical stage. Our sensible and well-trained army knows this fact very well. Secondly, martial law is often imposed under the patronage of a super power. At present, Pakistan’s relations with the USA remain abysmal. Therefore, the army will avoid taking rein of the government directly. As such, martial law is now obsolete and the democratic government will continue to rule Pakistan.

Another hope for democracy in Pakistan is created in the form of maturity among the democratic leaders. In past, one Democratic Party conspired against another ruling party and stalled democratic progress. For example, Pakistan National Alliance (PNA) staged protest against Zulifqar Ali Bhutto after 1977 general elections claiming the elections being rigged. The issue could have been resolved through political settlement, but they demanded the removal of Bhutto and imposition of Islamic rule. Consequently, the military got an opportunity to impose martial law under Zia in 1977 and obstructed the path of democracy. Besides, Nawaz Sharif, while Chief Minister of Punjab, created problems for Benazir Bhutto and tried hard to remove her government. Similarly, Benazir Bhutto played a role to remove Nawaz Sharif in 1993. The both democratic leader celebrated ouster of each other from the government and distributed sweets among their supporters. At present, the democratic leaders avoid taking such actions that could impede the democratic progress. For example, during 2008 PPP government, Nawaz Sharif was engaged in verbal war with Zardari, but did not stage protest to remove him. On the other hand, Zardari got an opportunity to remove Nawaz government during Imran Khan continuous protest in Islamabad. However, he realized that it would play in the hand of anti-democratic elements. Thus, the democratic leaders have now turned mature and avoiding taking any step that could harm the civilian rule.

The good performance of successive democratic governments has also contributed towards the well being of the democracy in Pakistan. The democratic governments are heading towards betterment. For instance, the existing government is better than previous government and the upcoming will have undergone even more improvement. The democratic government of Pakistan Peoples Party, from 2008 to 2013, faced numerous challenges of extremism and terrorism. However, the next democratic government under Nawaz Sharif successfully resolved those challenges and brought peace. The existing government under PTI is facing daunting economic challenges but is taking stringent measures to overcome them. Thus, the better performance of the governments has proved that fact that civilian can also run the country effectively and has left no room for the army to interfere in the administration directly.

The smooth transfer of power by two democratic parties to another one has enhanced the chances of democracy to flourish in the country too. For the first time in the history of Pakistan, two democratic parties have completed and transferred their power to the third one. It has created a proper line for power transfer in the future, which is fundamental pre-requisite for the glory of democracy in any country. Before, it was witnessed that the transfer was not smooth and created room for the anti-democratic elements. For instance, as mentioned above, had the democratic leader, after the elections of 1977, not created problems for power transfer, the military would have not imposed martial law. It was because of non-agreement on the transfer of power in past, democracy could not survive for a long time. Thus, the smooth transfer of power, now, will ensure the continuation of democracy in Pakistan.

The reform in the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) and its improved performance is another ingredient that creates a hope for democracy in Pakistan. At present, the prime minister with the consultation of leader of opposition appoints the chief election commissioner. The ruling government cannot appoint its own commissioner to get the election rigged. Besides, a proper mechanism for the appointment of the members has also been devised to ensure the transparent elections. It can be proved from the recent appointment of the two members of the ECP. In 2019, the two vacant seats of the members of the ECP could not been filled since eight months despite the constitutional provision for filling the seats in 45 days. It was because the federal government under Imran Khan and opposition could not reach a consensus on the names. In a surprise move, the government appointed the members without consultation, but the chief election commissioner refused to administer the oath of office to these appointees and claimed that the appointment was not based in accordance with the provision of constitution. Thus, it is reached that the reforms in the ECP is playing a vital role in promoting the democracy by conducting smooth and transparent elections.

The citizen of Pakistan have, now, turned aware about their rights to rule the country and it is a good sign for the development of democracy. Before, many citizens welcomed the dictator because the democratic leaders failed to improve their lifestyle. However, the people in uniform could not satisfy their needs as well. As a result, they have turned against dictators too. At present, almost all the citizens speak against the martial law and blame the military for their present poor conditions. Now, instead of welcoming their rule, they will stand against them in the same way the people of turkey blocked the prospects of military rule by lying before the tanks. Thus, the local citizen, now, loathes martial law and it is a good for the prosperity of democracy in the country.

A major hurdle, of course, is the indirect interference of the military in the democratic government. The military not only frame foreign policy of Pakistan, but also implement it. The civilian has no say in the policies towards India, Afghanistan and the US. Besides, the head of Intelligence bureau or other sensitive institutions like defense is always retired military officer. It means that the civilians are not trusted with the sensitive policies. Currently, many retired military officers are occupying some important posts. For instance, the federal Interior minister is Ijaz Ahmed Shah. He is a former head of Intelligence bureau and a retired army officer. Besides, Lieutenant General Asim Saleem Bajwa is serving as the Special Assistant to the Prime Minister on Information and Broadcasting. He is retired Pakistani three-star general. Thus, the indirect rule of the military does not bode well for the democracy in Pakistan.

The feudal lord system is acting as the stumbling rock in the way of democracy in Pakistan. Democracy relies on the votes of the local citizens. However, in Pakistan, some feudal lords enjoy full control over the authority and decisions of people in their respective areas. Normally, these feudal lords own thousands of acres agriculture lands and almost all the people living in the villages act as their farmers. These people rely on them economically. It is, therefore, during elections, they vote only a candidate told by their feudal lords. They do not act on their own interest, but over the command of their superiors. In many cases, these feudal lords contest elections themselves. Consequently, they win the elections no matter how corrupt they are and from which political party they contest. Thus, the system of feudal lord is the basic hurdle in the way of democracy in Pakistan.

The fact that, almost all the democratic leaders are corrupt, also contributes to the fragility of the democracy in Pakistan. They mostly work for the wider self-interest rather than the interest of the country and its citizens after being elected. They also favor the non-transparent appointment of the government servants to fill the institutions with their own people. Besides, they use the public funds for their personal expenditure and deem it below their dignity to not make piles of illegal money. They use the same money to win the elections. It was proved by the recent accountability campaign of PM Imran Khan. Under his drive, the main leaders of the two main democratic parties were arrested on the account of corruptions. The panama leaks also revealed some names of the democratic leaders including farmer PM Nawaz Sharif. Because of their corruption, the local people dislike democracy and some time talk in the favor of the authoritarian rule. Hence, the corruption of the democratic leaders is blocking the route of democracy in the country.

The poor literacy rate of Pakistan is negatively affecting the performance of the democratic governments very badly. It is known fact that the democratic system is successful in the countries where the literacy rate is good. It is because; a person with good education background, knows the importance of his vote and uses it properly for the betterment of the country. As a result, efficient democratic leaders are elected that grab the rein of the country. Because of this reason, democracies are bearing fruitful results in the developed countries like the US and is completely collapsing in those countries where the literacy rate is poor. In Pakistan, with around 50 per cent illiterate people, democracy has failed to improve the lifestyle of the people and solve the existing crisis faced by the country. Thus, it is not wrong to say that inadequate literacy rate is causing damage to democracy in Pakistan.

The cripple economy of Pakistan also hampers the democratic progress. The better economic position of any country is directly proportional to the prosperity of democracy. The democratic system evolved from Greece because the export of the wine improved its economic position and thus a demand was raised for the civilian rule. The system remained successful. However, democracy has performed poorly in the countries facing the economic crisis. Take a classical example of Pakistan. The biggest hurdle faced by the PM Imran Khan is the major economic challenges faced by the country. These crises have not only made it difficult for his democratic government to focus on the other issues, but also created bad feelings among the citizen regarding the system. As such, the poor economy of Pakistan is acting as a biggest hurdle in the way of democracy.

An association of democratic nations must be formed to protect young democracies around the world including Pakistan from the threat of the dictators. The strong democratic nations like the US and European countries should extend their support to the civilian rules during crisis. Democracy needs support and the best support for democracy can come from other democracies. Had there been an association of democratic nations, it would have been difficult for the dictators like Zia and Musharraf to impose martial law in Pakistan. Alarmingly, in Pakistan, the military rule received generous financial support from the US, while the civilians were sidelined every time. Thus, the only way to sustain democracy in Pakistan is to form an association of democratic nations at the global level.

It is imperative for the indigenous democratic leaders to improve their performance and work hard for the betterment of the civilian to win their support. Democracy needs the cooperation of the local citizens to flourish in any country. However, the most of the democratic leaders are corrupt in Pakistan and has failed to show distinguish performance. As a result, democracy has become infamous in the country. Had they worked with faithfulness and honesty to improve the lifestyle of the people, it would have been nearly impossible for the dictators to impose direct rule. It was because of the inefficient of the democratic leaders that the citizens never resisted the military. Otherwise, they would have lay before the tanks the same way the citizens did in Turkey when a dictator tried to impose martial law there. Thus, the democratic leaders need to improve their performance to block all the route of anti democratic elements.

As such, it is reached that there is hopes as well as hurdles in the way of democracy in Pakistan. Some events like inability of the military to impose direct rule under current circumstances, mature leadership as compared to past, better performance of successive democratic governments, smooth transfer of powers by the democratic parties, improvement in the performance of the ECP and awareness among the people regarding the civilian rule, have created hope for democracy in Pakistan. In the contrast, some other events like, indirect interference of the military in the democratic governments, feudal lords system, corruption of democratic leaders, alarming literacy rate and poor economy of the country, have caused hurdles in the way of democracy in Pakistan. Keeping in view this situation, an association of democratic nations must be formed to save democracy from the anti-democratic elements. Besides, it is imperative for the democratic leaders to strive for improving the lifestyle of the local citizens to win their cooperation. Thus, democracy in Pakistan faces both hopes and hurdles and it is important to remove impediments to further flourish the civilian rule.

EDITOR PICKS

Causes of the russian invasion of ukraine, neo-cold war in the 21st century: us vs china, the qur’anic, scientific and logical arguments for god’s existence, popular posts, political parties are responsible for imposition of martial laws in pakistan, impact of climate change on the national security of pakistan, improvement in pakistan’s foreign policy, popular category.

International Relations 34
Pakistan/Current Affairs 30
Foreign policy 10
Afghanistan 8
Gender Studies 7
Climate Change 6
ISLAMIC STUDIES 6
Privacy Policy

₨ 0

What is Democracy? (Urdu)

Education for all (urdu), what are the key features of a democracy (urdu).

Uncategorized
Urdu Dubbed Videos

Democracy is a political system featuring the principle of the ‘rule by the people.’ Instead of having one person making all the decisions in a country, democracy brings together the views and interests of all people so that the future of the country can be decided based on all these views.

A joint Urdu dubbing project of Mashal Books and the Eqbal Ahmad Centre for Public Education with generous support from Nasser Ahmad / The i-Care Foundation .

Also watch What are the Key Features of a Democracy?

Special thanks to Civics Academy SA .

What is Magna Carta? (Urdu)

A Brief History of the Pandemics over the Last Century (Urdu)

Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection (Urdu)

Username or email *

Password *

Remember me Login

Lost your password?

Create an account?

Essay on “Democracy in Pakistan” for CSS, and PMS

January 24, 2022
Essay for CSS PMS and Judiciary Exam

This is an Essay on “Democracy in Pakistan” for CSS, PMS, and Judiciary Examinations. Democracy is a form of government in which the people have the authority to deliberate and decide legislation, or to choose governing officials to do so.” Democracy is a system of government in which power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or through freely elected representatives. As Democracy is a very popular topic so, here is a complete Essay on “Democracy in Pakistan” for CSS, PMS, and judiciary examinations.

What is democracy? Essentials of democracy Democracy in Pakistan

A brief history

The early period from 1947-58
Period of General Ayub and General Zia
Political turmoil and General Pervaiz Musharraf

Causes of failure of democracy in Pakistan

Delayed Framing of the Constitution
Leadership Crisis
Lack of education
No independence of the judiciary
Weak political parties and their infighting
Delayed elections and rigging
Corruption and nepotism
Quasi-Federalism and Conflict between Eastern and Western Wings
Terrorism and extremism

Pakistani Democracy Vs. Western Democracy

Suggestions

Effective accountability of the politicians
Reforming judiciary
Abolish feudalism
Eliminate corruption
Two parties system on the pattern of the USA, UK
Amendment in the constitution
Fair and free election
Increase the education budget to educate people
Uninterrupted democratic process
Strengthening the institutions

Essay on “Democracy in Pakistan” for CSS, PMS, and Judiciary Examinations

“You have to stand guard over the development and maintenance of Islamic democracy, Islamic social justice, and the equality of manhood in your own native soil.” -Muhammad Ali Jinnah,

To acquire immunity to eloquence is of the utmost importance to the citizens of a democracy. – Bertrand Russell

Democracy is a form of government in which all citizens have an equal say in the decisions that affect their lives. Ideally, this includes equal (and more or less direct) participation in the proposal, development, and passage of legislation into law. It can also encompass social, economic, and cultural conditions that enable the free and equal practice of political self-determination. While there is no specific, universally accepted definition of ‘democracy’, equality and freedom have both been identified as important characteristics of democracy since ancient times. These principles are reflected in all citizens being equal before the law and having equal access to legislative processes.

For example, in a representative democracy, every vote has equal weight, no unreasonable restrictions can apply to anyone seeking to become a representative, and the freedom of its citizens is secured by legitimized rights and liberties which are generally protected by a constitution.

Many people use the term “democracy” as shorthand for liberal democracy, which may include elements such as political pluralism; equality before the Jaw; the right to petition elected officials for redress of grievances; due process; civil liberties; human rights ; and elements of civil society outside the government. In the United States, separation of powers is often cited as a central attribute, but in other countries, such as the United Kingdom, the dominant principle is that of parliamentary sovereignty (though in practice judicial independence is generally maintained).

In other cases, “democracy” is used to mean direct democracy. Though the term “democracy” is typically used in the context of a political state, the principles are applicable to private organizations and other groups as well.

Democracy in Pakistan

Democracy in its true spirit has never been allowed to take root in Pakistan. Since its independence in 1947, a military-bureaucratic establishment has always governed the country. Army generals usurp power at their own convenience and quit only when they are forced to quit by mass political movements or by sudden unexpected death. When forced by external or internal pressures, democracy is given a chance but in reality, a group of army generals keeps controlling the decision-making.

This direct or indirect military influence is the greatest impediment to the evolution of a stable governing system in Pakistan. Besides, the army is not solely responsible for this mass but it is our inefficient politicians who provide an opportunity for to army to take over.

A brief history of Democracy in Pakistan

Recalling the last 62 years of Pakistan, democracy is found only as an interval before the next military general comes to the scene. The future of democracy was doomed from the start when Liaquat Ali Khan, the first elected Prime Minister, was shot at a public gathering. Nobody knows to this day who did it and why. From now on, the balance of power was to shift in the favor of the military. A comparison tells us how this shift came up. From 1951-57 India had one Prime Minister and several army chiefs while during the same period Pakistan had one army chief and several Prime ministers.

The same army chief, the Sandhurst-trained general, Ayub Khan was to announce the first martial law in the country in 1958 and then a series of military rules were to follow.

General Ayub Khan could not withstand a popular national movement against him and transferred power to General Yahya Khan in March 1969. Under him, Pakistan lost its half which is now Bangladesh. Power was then transferred to Zulfikar Ali Bhutto as the first civilian martial law administrator. Bhutto pursued an independent policy, which was against what generals and the US wanted, and he had to pay with his life.

Charged for compliance in murder, Bhutto was hanged by the next martial law administrator, General Zia ul Haq. The hanging of an elected Prime Minister was shocking news to the world and Pakistan was to have the effects years later. The general died in a mysterious plane crash.

Then came a ten years gap of experimentation with democracy and every two years each elected government was ousted by the special discretionary powers of the president . An end to this ten-year spell came with a new general coming to power ousting the incumbent elected government of Mian Nawaz Sharif. This time the Prime Minister was charged with conspiring against the state and was ousted from the country.

The immediate and foremost requirement of the Constituent Assembly was to frame a democratic constitution for the country. The constitution had to lay down the form of government, and the role of the judiciary, military, and bureaucracy. It had to decide the basic issues about provincial autonomy, religion and the state, the joint or separate electorate, representation of minorities and women in assemblies, fundamental rights, and civil liberties.

The debate over the representation of eastern and western wings of the country and religion versus secularism were the two main hindrances in the way of framing the constitution. As against India, which was able to frame the constitution of the country within two years of independence in 1949, Pakistan took nine years to finalize the constitution in 1956, which did not work for more than two years and was abrogated.

The second constitution was framed by a military ruler General Ayub in 1962 which could last as long as he was in power. Finally, it was after the separation of East Pakistan and a lapse of more than a quarter of a century (1947-1973) that the elected representatives of the people under the leadership of Prime Minister Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto framed a consensus constitution envisaging a federal, democratic structure for the country and a parliamentary form of government.

This constitution has survived in spite of the breakdown of democracy twice in 1978 and 1999 and hopefully has come to stay. But the delay in framing the constitution harmed the growth of political democracy, as it allowed the authoritarian rule of the Governor-General to continue for seven long years (1947-56), which set this inglorious tradition in the country.

The second obstacle in the way of democracy is the culture of feudalism. Democracy cannot develop in the suffocating atmosphere of feudalism. The history of feudalism in the subcontinent is not very old. It owes its origin to the war of independence in 1857 when different people were awarded large swathes of land by the British government because of their treacherous cooperation with the latter. Those feudal families joined Muslim League when they saw that Pakistan was going to be a reality and inherited power after the death of the founding father. Feudalism has now become a severe migraine for the nation. Democracy and feudalism are incompatible.

Change of faces at the wheel has not served any purpose. Even these feudal lords occupy more than 70 % of our land leaving the people to lead a miserable life. They are senators, ministers, MPAs, MNAs, and also the owners of major industries in Pakistan. There is a crying need to bring some structural changes in order to strengthen the political system. Industrialization has also played a significant role in the strengthening of democracy across the world. Great Britain is considered the mother of democracies on this planet.

Some analysts are of the view that democracy has its origin in the Magna Carta, Bill of Rights and Habeas Corpus, etc. But even after these developments very mighty rulers have ruled Great Britain. In fact, the invention of the steam engine led to the industrial revolution which eradicated the roots of feudalism and the evil of absolute monarchy. All this resulted in the development of democracy. In Pakistan, there is everything from adult franchises to the separation of powers between the three organs of government but no plan for that kind of industrial revolution.

Quaid-i-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah, the father of the nation and the first Governor-General, died just one year after the establishment of Pakistan on September 11, 1948, and his right-hand lieutenant Liaquat Ali Khan, who was the first Prime Minister, was assassinated on October 16, 1951. About the capability of other leaders of the Pakistan Muslim League (PML), the party which had successfully piloted the movement for Pakistan, Jinnah had ruefully remarked that “he had false coins in his pocket”.

Consequently, several ministers appointed initially were not politicians and did not have a seat in the Assembly. Similarly, in 1954, there were several members of the Prime Minister’s cabinet without a seat in Parliament. “The cabinet and other high political appointments reflected a paucity of talent among the politicians.”

It is indeed a sad commentary on the elected members of the first Legislature and Constituent Assembly of Pakistan that they could not find a suitable head of state from among their own ranks. Most of them came from the civil bureaucracy or the military. The civil-military bureaucracy did not have a favorable opinion about the competence of political leaders and often took decisions without consulting them. This adversely affected their political training, development, and growth.

The inability to control the Anti-Ahmadiya Movement in Punjab in 1953 was blamed on inept political leadership. This religious movement was spearheaded by the religious Ahrar Party which had opposed the establishment of Pakistan and now wanted again to come into the limelight. They were supported by other religious parties, i.e., Jamaat-i-Islami, JamiatuiUlema-i-Pakistan, and JamiatulUlerna-i-Islam. The movement was exploited by politicians in their own political interests.

But the civil-military bureaucracy was against the religious parties dominating the power structure either in the provinces or the center. To rescue the city of Lahore where Ahmadis were in a “virtual state of siege” and their properties were being “burned or looted”, General Azam Khan, the Area Commander, was ordered by the Defense Secretary, to impose martial law in Lahore. It was met with the general approval of the people.

It was demonstrated that the civil-military bureaucracy “would not let politicians or religious ideologues lead the country to anarchy”. This also laid down the foundations of the supremacy of the military and orchestrated the initial rehearsal for the recurring imposition of Martial Law in the country and its acceptance by the people.

Lack of education has remained an important impediment to the democratization of countries. This is not just a problem for Pakistan but of the whole Third world. Laski, a famous political thinker said that education is the backbone of democracy. Democracy is a system of governance in which the people choose their representatives through elections. Their strength lies in the ballot box. If people are not vigilant and educated enough to make a better choice, democracy will not flourish in that country.

This is the main reason that even in the countries apparently practicing democracy but the majority of uneducated people are among the under-developed nations. Masses in Pakistan have not found ways of compelling their rulers to be mindful of their duty. Their failures in this regard result from insufficiency of experience and training in operating modem democratic politics. Democracy puts the highest premium on constitutionalism, which is possible only with the predominant majority of people. Pakistan’s democracy can neither improve nor become viable as long as the majority of the population remains uneducated.

Judiciary is one of the most important pillars of a state and in a country where the judiciary is not imparting justice , democracy cannot develop. During the Second World War, someone asked British Prime Minister Winston Churchill whether the British would win the war. The Prime Minister laughed and replied that if the British courts were dispensing justice, no one would trounce the United Kingdom. In Pakistan since 1954 judiciary has remained docile to the wishes of the executive. As Shelley says, “If the winter comes; can spring be far behind”.

In fact, since its birth, Pakistan has been governed by bureaucratic, military, and political elites. The bureaucratic elite generally became more assertive, steadily increasing their power at the expense of the political elite. Ayub’s term of office (1958-69) was the golden era for the bureaucracy, which exercised its powers, unbridled by any political interference. The weakness of political elites can be demonstrated by the fact that during seven years from 1951 to 1958, as many as seven Prime Ministers had been changed.

From 1988 to 1999, four democratically elected governments were replaced on charges of corruption, inefficiency, security risk, etc. The civil-military bureaucracy has dominated governance owing to the inherent weakness of the political parties and their incompetent leadership, resulting in the derailment of democracy thrice in the history of Pakistan, i.e., in 1958, 1977, and 1999.

Pakistan was not created as a theocracy but as a place where an economically marginalized minority could operate a democracy independently. It was to save the people from religious discrimination and domination by an overwhelming religious majority. Moreover, it emerged as a territorial state in the Muslim majority areas of the subcontinent. But the religious and secular groups soon started making conflicting demands while formulating the constitution of Pakistan.

The speech of Mr. Jinnah on August 11, 1947, addressed to the first legislative and constituent assembly of Pakistan, advocated political pluralism and declared that the “religion or caste or creed has nothing to do with the business of the State”. This has not adhered to the Objectives Resolution passed by the Constituent Assembly in 1949, which pacified the demands of Muslim religious parties and elements but was not supported by religious minorities.

The compromise solution attempted to balance the values and the spirit of Islam with the requirements of secularism. Due to a lack of competent and visionary political leadership , and the fact that Muslims constituted 98 percent of the population, the conservative religious leaders, partly due to their conviction and partly owing to their parochial interests, advocated and preached the establishment of a religiopolitical system based on Al-Quran and Sunnah.

They were skeptical of the politico-social development of modem times and western political institutions and forms of government. Their dogmatic theology clashed with the democratic culture envisioned by the founding fathers. Another adverse impact of the adoption of religion as a guiding principle in the constitution, was the promotion of religious sectarianism, especially between the two major sects inhabiting Pakistan, i.e., Sunnis and Shi’as. Some sections of these sects, instead of peaceful negotiations to overcome their differences, often resort to violence, which is against the spirit of both Islam and democracy. These rivalries fostered reliance on the security forces for the maintenance of law and order, which eroded the hold of democratic institutions in governance.

For any healthy constitutional and political system to function smoothly, strong and well-entrenched political parties are essential. Unfortunately, political parties in Pakistan have failed to develop into strong vehicles of national political will. The main responsibility for safeguarding democracy in a country falls on political parties. Pakistan, since its inception, was lacking well-organized and well-established political parties that could carry the representative system of governance forward.

The All-India Muslim League, which had piloted the movement of Pakistan from 1940 to 47, was not a well-organized political party, but it was primarily a movement. Leading a movement and organizing a political party are two different things. Most of its leaders belonged to areas that became part of the Indian Union and their majority did not come to Pakistan. Those who were in Pakistan, barring a few exceptions, belonged to feudal and landowning classes that in their nature were in conflict with the democratic dispensation. In fact “the leadership of the Pakistan movement had few roots in the land that became Pakistan.”

Their incompetence and constant wrangling for power in the initial nine years (1947-1956) were also responsible for the delay in constitution-making. Instead of cooperation and mutual accommodation, there was ceaseless infighting. For instance, as early as 1953, a clash between the leadership of Punjab and the central government led to intense communal riots and the imposition of Martial Law in Lahore, the provincial capital. Even as late as the decade 1988-99 of civil supremacy, the fight between the PML and the PPP led to the repeated dissolution of national and provincial assemblies and the dismissal of prime ministers and their cabinets. Finally, it ended with the military takeover in 1999.

The representative character of the civilian parliamentary government during the first decade of Pakistan’s existence was eroded because the country was governed under the Government of India Act of 1935. The purpose of the Act was “to make the appointed governor-general exert dominance over the elected prime minister.” The Act introduced a representative and centralized system of bureaucratic governance, which was an imperative requirement of the colonial government but not of democratic governance. The first general elections in the country should have been held in 1951, i.e., five years after the previous elections in 1946, but this could not happen till 1970.

The reasons for the delay were that the ruling elite, i.e., civil bureaucrats, migrant political leadership, and weak political parties, had few roots in the masses. As a consequence, general elections could not be held for 23 years (1947-1970) of the country’s initial history. On the expiry of the five years term of Prime Minister Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto (1972-1977), the second general elections on the basis of the adult franchise were held on March 7, 1977, which the PPP won with a vast majority.

The opposition parties alleged that the elections had been “rigged on a massive scale”. It has been commented: Elections in Pakistan had been rigged before, notably the presidential election in 1965 and the Provincial Assembly,y elections in the early 1950s, but rigging in these instances did not arouse the mass uprising as it did in 1977. The people of Pakistan were evidently not of the same mind now as they were in those earlier periods.

Corruption in bureaucracy and among political leaders poses a grave threat to good democratic governance. Quaid-i-Azam had termed corruption as “poison” and asked to put that down with an “iron hand”. Now that the international Reconciliation Ordinance, .vnich had withdrawn from prosecution any person “falsely involved for political reasons or through political victimization” between 1986 and 1999, has lapsed on November 28, 2009, the concerned individuals should get themselves cleared in a court of law in a transparent manner. The tribal nature of society in Pakistan is susceptible to nepotism. As an antidote, accountability and transparency are necessary. It is a challenge to the people to reject those leaders and political parties which indulge in corruption and nepotism.

One of the main bottlenecks in constitutional development in Pakistan was that its two wings were separated by about 1000 miles of hostile territory. The eastern wing consisted of one province but was more populous’ than the western wing which was much larger in the area and had as many as four provinces.

The western wing was not prepared to concede majority representation to the eastern wing in the parliament. After a confrontation of nine years between the two wings, the solution was evolved in the l956 constitution in the shape of parity of representation in a quasi-federal structure, neutralizing the majority of the eastern wing and paving the way for the manipulated domination of the western wing.

The domination of the western wing in governance led to an insurgency in the eastern wing which culminated in the separation and independence of Bangladesh in 1971. In post-1971 Pakistan, it came to be realized that ideological moorings alone could not easily overcome ethnic and economic differences. Yet the anti-ethnic attitude and anti-modem thinking prevalent in certain segments of society lean toward a unitary or quasi-federal state as against a true federation.

The latest threat is emanating from extremism and terrorism, especially in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK) and the Federally Administered Tribal Area (FATA). This is the spillover effect of the conflict in Afghanistan and is spreading to Pakistan. It is likely to continue as long as there is no peace and stability in that country. However, the military enjoying the support of the nation is successfully combating the extremists and terrorists under the supremacy of the civilian democratic government. It is hoped that the process would continue to its logical conclusion.

Due to the migration of literate Hindus and Sikhs to India, the literacy rate in Pakistan sharply declined. There was about 95 percent illiteracy in Pakistan in 1947, which acted as a hindrance to the growth of civil and democratic society. Feudalism and economic constraint did not permit any Pakistani government to launch a “crash course to expand literacy and grow higher standards.

The national economy has gone bankrupt and the national budget has become all foreign aid-dependent. Islam was the ideology that gave life to the Pakistan movement and later Pakistan itself but is now infested with sectarianism. Military policies gifted the country with cross-border terrorism and three million internally displaced people. Despite having the largest chunk of the national budget and being the seventh-largest army in the world, the Pakistan army is now in a mess of its own creation with little of its hard-earned prestige left to its credit.

The distorted face of the national system as a whole and the failure of the judiciary to guard the constitution of Pakistan are the major factors contributing to the change in the national mindset. The events of the last two years have clearly shown the preference of the people of Pakistan. The masses want democracy as a political and governing system for the country and a judiciary that guard the rights of the people. The military would be respected more if it stays in the barracks or guarded the national borders. The murder of Benazir Bhutto has taught new lessons.

If one compares Pakistani democracy with Western democracy it is said that for over 50 years, Pakistan remains occupied by three major interest groups in the time, opportunities, and resources of the besieged nation. The army, civil service, and the neo-colonial appointed landlords. If there was any rational tolerance scale, the Pakistani nation would certainly secure high marks on its standard of tolerance and survival under most unfavorable circumstances.

One of the pivotal factors supporting the notion of Western liberal democracies is that it provides opportunities for participation to ordinary citizens, right or wrong to culminate a sense of legitimacy for the election exercise and chose people of their interest to manage public affairs for a specified term. But the principles and standards for evil and good vary between the West and the Islamic world . Strange as is, in Pakistan, those who come to occupy the political offices never intend to quit the political power on their own except implication of military force through a coup.

Comparatively, on occasions, western democracies do” encourage educated and competent citizens to strive for their high ideas and ideals and come to the front stage and demonstrate their intentions and will power to seek the goal of ideal public service agendas. E.H. Carr defines the teaching-learning role of history and its value must not be ignored but preserved. Recall the Pakistani military dictators for the last forty-plus years, they each consumed a decade or more to relinquish power, that was not theirs in any systematic and logical context. Ayub Khan was ousted by Yahya Khan.

General Yahya with the complacency of Z.A. Bhutto surrendered East Pakistan to India (now Bangladesh) to share power with Bhutto but was put under house arrest as Bhutto assumed the power that did not belong to him based on the verdict of the people. Rightfully, it was Sheikh MujiburRehman, leader of the East Pakistan Awami League who should have been sworn in as the new leader of united Pakistan but it was treacherously undone by Yahya and Bhutto.

Both should have been tried as traitors in a court of law and punished. Not so, they were rewarded and Bhutto became the first civilian martial law administrator and self-made president of defeated Pakistan in December 1971. Dr.Ishtiaq Qureshi, editor of the Urdu Digest recorded for the history (“Sukoot-e-Dacca seyPurdhautha Hay”- Facts are revealed after the Dacca Surrender) that “in the quest for its survival Pakistan lost its destiny. Yahya and Mujib stabbed the body of Pakistan with one dagger and Bhutto will stab Pakistan with another dagger.”

Suggestions for Democracy in Pakistan

Fo1lowing are the suggestions for improving democracy in Pakistan:

An impartial system of accountability enhances public trust in the political system. It provides enormous strength to the democratic process. Moreover, it compels thousand who are charged with governance, to transparently discharge their official responsibilities. It ensures good governance and strengthens the political setup. In spite of facing innumerable challenges and showing unsatisfactory performance, Pakistanis have the capability to emerge as a democratic and progressive nation. Pakistan can road to democracy with the dedication, determination, commitment, courage, and patriotism of its political leaders.

Reforming the judiciary and incorporating Islamic laws can also soothe the deprived and poor masses who have been manipulated by the extremists due to the sheer negligence of the elected governments and ruling elite. This natura11y causes bitterness toward the present form of political setup.

Moving on, corruption and selfish attitudes are eating away at the institutional structure of our country and such practices never allow democracy to flourish. There is also a need for mature political leadership, which can think above its own gains. All this can only emerge after the formulation and implementation of strict accountability.

On the contrary, weak public institutions can be made strong and productive if the power and authority seep down. The example of many European countries is in front of us, where institutions are powerful and not politicians. Democracy in actuality can only be achieved through such measures.

Our constitution has been a source of constant controversy. Be it the realization of Islamic laws or the concentration of power in the head of the state, the constitution has served as a tool for the legitimization of alien changes and policies. Keeping the constitution intact has been long overdue. No one in power should be allowed to change it for prolongation of rule or appeasing any particular section. The Pakistani movement envisaged a democratic country with a federal structure.

In all Constitutions of Pakistan (1956, 1962, and 1973) the objectives of governance, in the words of Dr. Ainslie T. Embree, Professor Emeritus of Columbia University, are democracy, freedom, equality, tolerance, and social justice as enunciated by Islam, giving Muslims freedom to live their lives in accordance with the teachings of Islam, but with minorities having full freedom to profess their own religions.

Islam lays emphasis on the concept of Shura, i.e., consultation among people, which is the essence of democratic culture. Quaid-i-Azam, the founder of Pakistan had stated:

“We leamed democracy 1300 years ago. Democracy is i11 our blood. It is ill our marrows. Dilly centuries of adverse circumstances have made the circulation of that blood cold. It has got frozen, and our arteries are not functioning. But thank God, the blood is circulating again, thanks to the Muslim League’s efforts. It will be a People’s government. Culturally, ill the region of Pakistan, there is a concept of Jirga or Panchayat, i.e., an assembly of elders, to settle issues and disputes involving two or more two persons. This system has, been prevalent for ages, much before the advent of Islam. Thus, both religion and age-old tradition advocate the concept of consultation in decision-making through all assembly of people, which is the essence of democracy.”

During the period of British supremacy in the subcontinent, the practice of elections to assemblies (local, provincial and central) was introduced through various enactments. Finally, it was the Government of India Act 1935 under which the dominions of India and Pakistan functioned after independence till they framed their own constitutions. These enactments provided the groundwork for democratic governance. It may be of interest to note that even when the democratic rule was suspended by the armed forces, the military rulers always came with the promise to restore democratic governance .

For instance, in 1970, General Yahya Khan is credited with organizing the first-ever general elections in the country, which led to the establishment of democratic governments both in Bangladesh and Pakistan. Besides holding general elections in 2002 and 2007, General Musharraf’s introduction of a local government system introduced in 2001 is considered a “laudable model of governance” because of its principle that whatever can be done at the local level should not be done at a higher tier of governance.

The country is on the path to achieving full literacy and progress towards a higher standard of education in important disciplines. This is strengthening the civil society in ensuring the prevalence of democratic culture at the lower and higher level of governance. Secondly, the print and electronic media in Pakistan are vibrant and independent. A responsible media educates the masses, raises political consciousness, and thus promotes democratic values, norms, and culture. In addition, a number of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) are playing an active role in the field of education and contributing to the growth of a vibrant civil society and good governance.

The essential step seems to stop interruption in the democratic process so that we may see more than promos. To judge something, it has to be allowed a chance to survive and act. The elected government must be allowed to complete its tenure in any case. The military has to play a positive role here and not interfere in the smooth democratic process.

As mentioned before, a part of the population wants greater Islamic character in the Govt. and laws. If we analyze this demand, it will be apparent that the enforcement of Sharia is more related to lawmaking. Therefore, what is immediately required is a change in the judicial setup, which has been unable to gain the trust of people until recently. Encouraging steps have already started in this case, but much more needs to be done.

Sadly, the same corrupted pool of thought keeps appearing with new faces and the deceived masses blindly follow them. This is due to the absence of any kind of accountability. Political compromises enhance this trend. Such practices are against moral, democratic as well as Islamic principles and should end immediately.

Next, the all-powerful bureaucracy and feudal politicians should be stripped of their unwarranted authority. It has been a slow evil that has weakened the country like nothing else. They are elected for serving people not to control them. The criteria of merit; the right to freedom and equal progress for common people have become a joke due to such an autocratic setup.

The people of Pakistan in general lack political psyche and consciousness. This is largely due to poor literacy and a never-ending feudalistic rule over 60% of the country. Therefore, it is necessary to educate the masses and make them aware of their political rights. This can begin with greater political socialization by political parties and media.

In a democratic state, media has rightly been called the fourth pillar of the state. It can play a most important role in the present age for creating awareness. Our media has risen from the ashes like a phoenix. It, however, needs to play a positive constructive role and not become another compromised institution as well.

Finally, the strategic position and now the war against terror call forth unwanted attention from the international community sometimes. In the past, military rule has been covertly or openly supported by many countries to gain their own benefits in this region. The international powers must stop interfering in the democratic process and for that to happen, our own government, people and media need to be equally strong.

Politicians may have learned lessons from their past mistakes and are more mature politically. Consensus politics seem to be emerging in the country. In the past, the constant infighting amongst political parties had often led to interference and take-over by the armed forces.

Now a culture of reconciliation, accommodation, and dialogue is emerging. The ideological polarization is diminishing. After the general elections of February 2008, four major political parties, i.e., Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP), PML – Nawaz (PML-N), Awami National Party (ANP), Jamiat-ulUlema-i-Islam – Fazalur Rahman (JUI-Fl and MuttahidaQaumi Movement (MQM) have joined hands to govern the country and re-establish the supremacy of the Parliament in accordance with the Constitution of 1973.

Our youth constitute 30% of the society they are representative of a new generation. Their participation may ensure structural improvements in the national paradigm. It has been witnessed that during the Pakistan movement youth played a vital role in opinion formation and mass awareness and so is the time now. There is a need to guide our youth to take responsibility for our tomorrow.

To sum up, it is the political leadership that can ensure the permanence of democratic governance. The prospects are, however, not as dismal as sometimes portrayed. Already, the literacy rate in Pakistan has increased to more than fifty-five percent. Efforts are afoot to improve the standard of higher education. Economic growth and industrialization have given birth to a vocal urban society and middle class, which is growing. and gradually lessening the influence of the feudal class.

The vibrant electronic and print media is playing an effective role in constructive criticism of the government and in educating the masses. Elections are being held regularly, representative political leadership and political parties are getting stronger and a peaceful mode of transfer of power is becoming the norm. The bureaucracy (both civil and military), though still powerful, may retreat gradually and submit to the people’s power and will and concede to democratic governance. The democratic process is progressing and, hopefully, will be obstructed and derailed, as in the past.

Expected question about this Essay:

Why has democracy failed in Pakistan?
What practical measures do you suggest for strengthening democracy in Pakistan?

Most relevant ▼

Essay on “Innovations are Never-ending Headways” for CSS, PMS
Essay on “Single National Curriculum Pave the Way for the Desired Ideological Integration in Pakistan Society” for CSS, PMS
Essay on “Single National Curriculum Paving the Way for the desired ideological integration in Pakistan Society” for CSS, PMS
Essay on “The cost of inaction is greater than the cost of action” for CSS, PMS
Essay on “Inflation – A Result of Poor Economic Policies or a Part of Global Economic Woes” for CSS, PMS
Essay on “Democracy without Justice is Tyranny” for CSS, PMS
Essay on “Man is Born Free but Everywhere he is in Chains” for CSS, PMS
Essay on “Power Corrupts: Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely” for CSS and PMS
Essay on the “Role of Social Media in the Modern World” for CSS and PMS
Essay on “Terrorism and its Socioeconomic Implications” for CSS, and PMS

Top searched

Saved words

chamanistaan

flower garden, lush garden, verdant meadow

the devil, satan

man-bhaavan

grateful or agreeable to the mind or soul, pleasing, amusing, diverting, acceptable, agreeable

a staccato musical mode with quick tempo, kind of song to a quick air

a hired labourer, worker

KHair-andesh

thinking well, well wisher

duudh-shariik bahan

foster sister

related to grief and death, elegiac

vessel, vase, receptacle

one third, one-third part

laa'nat

curse, anathema, imprecation, reproach, reproof, rebuke

qahr Dhaanaa

to be wrathful, to rage

chale na jaa.e aa.ngan Te.Dhaa

a bad workman blames his tools

aage naath na piichhe pagaa

heirless, lone, lone wolf

magician, sorcerer, wizard, conjuror

the celebration of of an engagement, betrothal, engagement

nazar-bhar dekhnaa

to look carefully

KHvaaja-e-taash

slaves of the same master in relation to one another, slave colleagues

kindness, mercy

Popular Blogs

The wave of elections has coloured all of our nation in shades of political awareness and knowledge. It is crucial for us, as responsible citizens to understand the importance of democracy and exercise our right to vote. And in the same spirit, today, we are here to take you on this political rally of Urdu words. In this blog, you will be introduced to the Urdu vocabulary of all things related to democracy. So, let us set on this expedition, so that the next time you discuss politics, you may have an elegant Urdu vocabulary to flaunt! First up is our key word jamhuuriyat, which we call democracy in English. Having origins in Arabic, the word jamhuuriyat stems from the root word jamhuur, which literally means a heap of sand. But, its metaphorical meaning refers to a a great number of people, a collective body (of men), a whole people or a republic. Then we have the word aaeen , which means constitution, law or a set of rules. Aaieen is a Persian word and is also used in the sense of a religious law, jurisprudence and politeness, civility or formality etc. However, its most popular usage in Urdu is in the context of the constitution (of a nation). The aaieen gives you all your constitutional rights, one of which is your right to vote, which is called Haq-e-raay-daahi in Urdu. One of the most important words related to democracy is intikhaab , which literally means selection. When used in a political context, intikhaab refers to the act of electing a representative, through the process of voting. After the elections are over and the votes are counted, the results declare the party which has won and formed a government. This party is called Hizb-e-iqtidaar , which translates to the ruling party. Hizb is Arabic in origin and refers to a group of people. Iqtidar on the other hand means authority, power, might or ability. But what is a ruling party, without a party opposing it? A party, which is in opposition to the ruling one, is called Hizb-e-Ikhtilaaf . Ikhtilaaf, also Arabic in origin, means difference, disagreement or opposition.

And with this, we warp it up for the key words related to democracy, which may come in handy in the forthcoming elections. Remember, it's not just about knowing the words; it's about using them to vote and shape the destiny of our nation. Now go forth, armed with knowledge and wit, and let democracy reign supreme!

Related blogs

Browse more explorations of similar nature

Ghalat-ul-Avam: The Surprising Success of Mispronounced Urdu Words

Dear readers, toady we’re setting forth on a journey to explore Urdu words that took a detour on the linguistic highway, only to arrive at their intended destination!

by Atifa Haroon
31 March 2024

Word Builders: Creating a Qaabil-e-Taareef Vocabulary

Are you someone who is often a part of enthusiastic conversations with Urdu speaking folks? If yes, then chances are that you must’ve heard the word ‘Qaabil’ at least a few times. The meanings of this word change according to the situations, and thus, makes it all the more worthy of today’s discussion.

by Mohd Ahmad Jafri
25 May 2024

Delete 44 saved words?

Do you really want to delete these records? This process cannot be undone

Want to show word meaning

Do you really want to Show these meaning? This process cannot be undone

Download Mobile app

Urdu poetry, urdu shayari, shayari in urdu, poetry in urdu

The best way to learn Urdu online

World of Hindi language and literature

Online Treasure of Sufi and Sant Poetry

Saved Words No saved words yet

Support rekhta dictionary. donate to promote urdu.

The Rekhta Dictionary is a significant initiative of Rekhta Foundation towards preservation and promotion of Urdu language. A dedicated team is continuously working to make you get authentic meanings of Urdu words with ease and speed. Kindly donate to help us sustain our efforts towards building the best trilingual Urdu dictionary for all. Your contributions are eligible for Tax benefit under section 80G.

The Real Concept of Democracy (Urdu) جمہوریت کی حقیقت

February 2022

National University of Modern Languages Islamabad

Discover the world's research

25+ million members
160+ million publication pages
2.3+ billion citations
Recruit researchers
Join for free
Login Email Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google Welcome back! Please log in. Email · Hint Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google No account? Sign up

Premium Content

Republic Policy

Constitutional Law

Criminal Law

International Law

Civil Service Law

Recruitment

Appointment

Civil Services Reforms

Legislature

Fundamental Rights

Civil & Political Rights

Economic, Social & Cultural Rights

Focused Rights

Political Philosophy

Political Economy

International Relations

National Politics

Organization

></center></p><ul><li>Investigative Reports</li><li>December 26, 2023</li></ul><h2>Free and Fair Elections in Pakistan: The Cornerstone of a Thriving Democracy</h2><p><center><img style=

Zafar Ahmed Gondal

Free and fair elections are not mere formalities; they are the lifeblood of any vibrant democracy. In Pakistan, where the quest for a stable and prosperous nation continues, ensuring free and fair elections is not just an aspiration, but an urgent necessity. Let’s delve deeper into why these elections are crucial for democracy, rule of law, functional governance, and ultimately, economic stability.

Democracy’s Bedrock:

At the heart of any democracy lies the principle of popular sovereignty, where the people hold the ultimate power to choose their representatives. Free and fair elections, devoid of manipulation or coercion, are the mechanisms through which this power is exercised. They ensure that the government reflects the will of the people, fostering legitimacy and public trust. Without them, democracy becomes a hollow shell, vulnerable to manipulation and instability.

Rule of Law’s Foundation:

Free and fair elections uphold the rule of law by ensuring that all citizens have an equal opportunity to participate in the political process. This includes the right to vote, stand for office, and campaign freely. It also entails the impartial application of electoral laws and regulations, safeguarding against discrimination and ensuring that everyone’s vote counts equally. When these principles are compromised, the rule of law crumbles, paving the way for corruption and injustice.

Functional Governance’s Engine:

Through free and fair elections, citizens elect representatives who are accountable to them. This accountability motivates elected officials to formulate policies and make decisions that serve the best interests of the people, not their own personal agendas. It fosters transparency and responsiveness, leading to more effective and efficient governance. Conversely, elections marred by fraud or manipulation produce a government that lacks legitimacy and public trust, hindering its ability to address critical issues and hindering progress.

Political Stability’s Catalyst:

Free and fair elections act as a safety valve for political tensions, allowing for peaceful transitions of power and settling political disputes through the ballot box. They provide a platform for diverse voices to be heard and represented, fostering inclusivity and reducing the risk of political extremism. Conversely, elections tainted by rigging or manipulation fuel frustration and discontent, leading to political instability, social unrest, and even violence. This instability deters investment, hinders economic growth, and ultimately harms the well-being of all citizens.

Economic Stability’s Precondition:

Free and fair elections are vital for economic stability by creating an environment conducive to investment and growth. A government elected through a credible process is more likely to be seen as trustworthy and capable of managing the economy effectively. This attracts foreign investment, encourages domestic entrepreneurship, and fosters a climate of predictability and stability that is essential for long-term economic prosperity. Conversely, a government tainted by electoral fraud or manipulation discourages investment, fuels corruption, and hinders economic development, ultimately harming the very people it is supposed to serve.

Recommendations for Ensuring Free and Fair Elections:

To ensure free and fair elections in Pakistan, a multi-pronged approach is crucial:

Strengthening the Election Commission: The ECP must be truly independent and impartial, with adequate resources and safeguards against political interference.
Transparent and Inclusive Process: Electoral laws and procedures should be clear, transparent, and accessible to all citizens. Voter education campaigns should be conducted to ensure informed participation.
Robust Security Measures: Strong security measures are needed to prevent violence, intimidation, and manipulation on election day.
Independent Media and Civil Society: A vibrant and independent media, along with an active civil society, can play a crucial role in monitoring elections, exposing irregularities, and holding authorities accountable.
Active Citizen Participation: Ultimately, the responsibility for ensuring free and fair elections lies with the people of Pakistan. Increased voter turnout, critical engagement with political discourse, and a willingness to hold elected officials accountable are essential for building a strong and thriving democracy.

The judiciary in Pakistan plays a crucial role in ensuring the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) conducts free and fair elections. This role can be broadly categorized into three key areas:

1. Pre-election Oversight:

Constitutionality of Electoral Laws: The judiciary can act as a safeguard against potentially flawed electoral laws passed by the legislature. Through judicial review, the Supreme Court can strike down or amend laws deemed unconstitutional, ensuring a level playing field and adherence to established democratic principles.
Dispute Resolution in Candidate Nominations: Candidates who are unfairly disqualified or denied nomination can seek redress through the courts. The judiciary can review ECP decisions and adjudicate disputes, ensuring no arbitrary exclusions and upholding the right to contest elections.
Election Campaign Monitoring: Courts can play a role in monitoring campaign financing and ensuring compliance with electoral regulations. This can include investigating allegations of bribery, voter intimidation, and misuse of state resources.

2. Election Day Supervision:

Grievance Redressal: Individuals and parties can approach courts if they encounter irregularities or violations during the voting process. The courts can issue orders to address these issues and ensure polling stations operate fairly and transparently.
Monitoring Complaints and Challenges: The judiciary can oversee the ECP’s handling of complaints filed against election officials or misconduct during voting. This ensures timely and impartial investigation of such matters.
Adjudicating Post-Poll Disputes: After the election results are announced, losing candidates can challenge them in court if they suspect fraud or irregularities. The courts can examine evidence, order recounts, or even nullify results and call for re-elections in extreme cases.

3. Post-election Scrutiny:

Reviewing and Upholding Electoral Code of Conduct: The judiciary can act as a guardian of the electoral code of conduct, holding politicians and parties accountable for violations committed during campaigns. This can include imposing sanctions and disqualifications for non-compliance.
Deciding Election Petitions: Petitions challenging the election results of specific candidates or parties are heard by the courts. Through meticulous examination of evidence and adherence to due process, the courts ensure the right result is ultimately declared.
Setting Precedents and Guiding Future Elections: By adjudicating election-related cases, the judiciary sets legal precedents and interprets electoral laws. These precedents guide future elections and contribute to evolving best practices for conducting free and fair polls.

Challenges and Concerns:

Despite its crucial role, the judiciary’s involvement in elections also faces challenges:

Potential for Judicial Overreach: Overreliance on the judiciary to resolve electoral disputes can undermine the ECP’s independence and authority. Balancing judicial oversight with ECP autonomy is crucial.
Politicization and Bias: Concerns about potential political bias within the judiciary can erode public trust in its decisions. Maintaining judicial independence and upholding the highest standards of impartiality are essential.
Lengthy Litigation Processes: The lengthy nature of court proceedings can delay finalization of election results, creating uncertainty and potentially hampering governance. Streamlining judicial procedures for election-related cases is crucial.

The judiciary in Pakistan plays a vital role in ensuring the ECP conducts free and fair elections. By providing pre-election oversight, election day supervision, and post-election scrutiny, the judiciary upholds the integrity of the electoral process and safeguards the democratic rights of Pakistani citizens. However, navigating the challenges of potential overreach, bias, and lengthy litigation is crucial for the judiciary to maintain its vital role as a guardian of free and fair elections in Pakistan.

Free and fair elections are not a luxury; they are the bedrock of a just, prosperous, and stable Pakistan. By prioritizing electoral integrity, Pakistan can unlock its full potential and build a future where every citizen has a voice, a chance to participate, and a stake in the nation’s success. The journey towards this ideal will require sustained commitment, collective action, and a unwavering belief in the power of the people to shape their own destiny.

Please, subscribe to the YouTube channel of republicpolicy.com

Search the Blog

An Overview of the History of Pakistan Pre & Post Independence

The Potential of Youth & International Youth Day

The Life and Politics of Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto: The Founder of Pakistan Peoples Party PPP

Political Turmoil in Bangladesh: A Disgraceful Exit of Hasina Wajid

The Stories of So-called Revolutions: A Critical Analysis

What is Federalism? Why is it Important for Pakistanis to Know it?

Rise and Fall of Hasina Wajid

A Critical Analysis on the Ousters of Haseena Wajid: What Next for Bangladesh?

Understanding the Limitations of Democracy: A Critical Examination

Good Governance in a Federal Form of Governance

Support our Cause

"Republic Policy Think Tank, a team of dedicated volunteers, is working tirelessly to make Pakistan a thriving republic. We champion reforms, advocate for good governance, and fight for human rights, the rule of law, and a strong federal system. Your contribution, big or small, fuels our fight. Donate today and help us build a brighter future for all."

Qiuck Links

Op Ed columns

Contact Details

Editor: +923006650789
Lahore Office: +923014243788
E-mail: [email protected]
Lahore Office # 307, Eden Hights opposite Rafi Group Jail Road
Islamabad Office: Zafar qamar and Co. Office No. 7, 1st Floor, Qasim Arcade, Street 124, G-13/4 Mini Market, Adjacent to Masjid Ali Murtaza, Islamabad
Submission Guidelines
Terms & Conditions
Privacy & Policy

| Developed and managed by Abdcorp.co

English To Urdu
Urdu To English
Roman Urdu To English
English To Hindi
Hindi To English
Roman Hindi To English
Translate English To Urdu
Translate Urdu To English
Translate English To Hindi
Translate Hindi To English
English Meaning In Urdu
Urdu Meaning In English
Urdu Lughat
English Meaning In Hindi
Hindi Meaning In English
Hindi Shabdkosh
English To Urdu Dictionary
Democracy Meaning In Urdu Dictionary

Democracy Meaning In Urdu

Democracy Meaning in English to Urdu is جمہوریت, as written in Urdu and Jamhoriat, as written in Roman Urdu. There are many synonyms of Democracy which include Commonwealth, Egalitarianism, Emancipation, Equalitarianism, Equality, Freedom, Justice, Republic, Suffrage, Representative Government, Liberal Government, etc.

[dih-mok-ruh-see]

Definitions of Democracy

n . Government by the people; a form of government in which the supreme power is retained and directly exercised by the people.

n . Government by popular representation; a form of government in which the supreme power is retained by the people, but is indirectly exercised through a system of representation and delegated authority periodically renewed; a constitutional representative government; a republic.

n . Collectively, the people, regarded as the source of government.

n . The principles and policy of the Democratic party, so called.

Form Noun, Plural Democracies.

How To Spell Democracy [dih-mok-ruh-see]

Origin of Democracy Late 16th century: from French démocratie, via late Latin from Greek dēmokratia, from dēmos ‘the people’ + -kratia ‘power, rule’.

Synonyms For Democracy , Similar to Democracy

Antonyms for democracy , opposite to democracy, more word meaning in urdu, free online dictionary, word of the day, parenthesis.

[puh-ren-thuh-sis]

جملہ معترضہ

Jumla Mutriza

Top Trending Words

	کثیر المقاصد
	قوسین
	واقع میں
	روپ
	جنسی تعصّب زدہ آدمی شخص
	جنگ نامہ
	میاں
	رونگٹھے
	گرم کہانی
	سیکس
	اللہ
	پشتو زبان
	باوفا ہونا
	تجرد
	خود پرست
	بگولا
	گرفت
	جلق لگانا
	جوش
	فوٹو آمیز

Dictionaries
English Urdu
English Hindi
Arabic Urdu
English Phrases
English Idioms
Synonyms & Definitions
English to Urdu
democracy Meaning

Democracy Meaning in Urdu

The word "Democracy" means جمہوریت (Jamhoriat) in Urdu. Democracy refers to (n.) Collectively, the people, regarded as the source of government.(n.) Government by the people; a form of government in which the supreme power is retained and directly exercised by the people.(n.) The principles and policy of the Democratic party, so called.(n.) Government by popular representation; a form of government in which the supreme power is retained by the people, but is indirectly exercised through a system of representation and delegated authority periodically renewed; a constitutional representative government; a republic. Synonyms for Democracy include Commonwealth, Republic. Other common words starting with the letter "D" include .

(n.) Government by popular representation; a form of government in which the supreme power is retained by the people, but is indirectly exercised through a system of representation and delegated authority periodically renewed; a constitutional representative government; a republic.

Democracy Urdu Meaning with Definition

Democracy is an English language word that means a country in which power is held by elected representatives. It can also be said to a form of government in which the entire population or all eligible residents of a state are represented by elected representatives.

Democracy meaning in Urdu:

The meaning of Democracy in Urdu is جمہوریت

Definition of Democracy:

Democracy can be defined as a government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or indirectly through a system of representation usually involving periodically held free elections.

Origin of Democracy:

The word Democracy comes in 1525–35;

What is the difference between Democracy and Republic?

A state in which the people and their elected representatives hold absolute power.

A system of government by the entire population or all eligible members of a state, generally through elected representatives.

Democracy Word Sentences:

How Democracy words use in our daily talks in 2022 like in politics, Academia, and Social life:

• Coverage of the scrutiny process is central to our parliamentary democracy.

• Democracy is present in schools in student-run groups like student council organizations.

• Freedom of speech is a central and sacred tenet of any democracy.

Easy to Understand Democracy meaning in Urdu examples:

جانچ پڑتال کے عمل کی کوریج ہماری پارلیمانی جمہوریت میں مرکزی حیثیت رکھتی ہے۔ •

جمہوریت اسکولوں میں طلبہ کے زیر انتظام گروپوں جیسے طلبہ کونسل تنظیموں میں موجود ہے۔ •

آزادی اظہار کسی بھی جمہوریت کا مرکزی اور مقدس اصول ہے۔ •

Essay On Election In Urdu

Back to: Urdu Essays List 3

جمہوریت میں انتخابات کا کردار

جمہوریت میں الیکشن کا بہت اہم کردار ہے کیونکہ اس کے بغیر صحت مند اور صاف ستھری جمہوریت ممکن نہیں ہے۔ باقاعدہ وقفوں سے ہونے والے منصفانہ انتخابات ہی جمہوریت کو مزید مضبوط بنانے میں معاون ہوتے ہیں۔ چونکہ ہندوستان ایک جمہوری ملک ہے ، لہٰذا یہاں کے لوگ اپنے ممبران اور عدلیہ کا انتخاب کر سکتے ہیں۔ ہندوستان کا ہر شہری ، جس کی عمر 18 سال سے زیادہ ہے ، اپنی ووٹ ڈالنے کی طاقت کا استعمال کر سکتا ہے اور انتخابات میں اپنی پسند کے امیدوار کو ووٹ دے سکتا ہے۔

در حقیقت انتخابات کے بغیر جمہوریت کا تصور نہیں کیا جاسکتا اور یہی جمہوریت کی طاقت ہے جو ملک کے ہر شہری کو اپنے اظہار کی آزادی دیتی ہے۔ اس سے ہمیں ایک آپشن ملتا ہے کہ ہم ایک مستحق شخص کا انتخاب کر سکیں اور انہیں صحیح عہدوں تک پہنچا کر ملک کی ترقی میں اپنا گراں قدر حصہ ڈالیں۔

انتخابات کی ضرورت

بہت سارے لوگوں کے ذریعے کئی بار یہ سوال پوچھا جاتا ہے کہ الیکشن کی ضرورت کیا ہے، یہاں تک کہ اگر انتخابات نہ ہوں تو بھی ملک میں گورنمنٹ(government) چلائی جاسکتی ہے۔ لیکن تاریخ اس کی گواہ رہی ہے کہ جہاں بھی حکمران ، قائد یا جانشین کے انتخاب میں امتیازی سلوک اور جبر رہا ہے، وہ ملک یا مقام کبھی ترقی نہیں کرسکا اور اسے ضرور منتشر کیا گیا ہے۔ یہی وجہ تھی کہ شاہی نظاموں میں بھی بادشاہ کے لئے صرف بادشاہ کا سب سے زیادہ اہل بیٹا منتخب کیا جاتا تھا۔

اس کی عمدہ مثال مہابھارت میں ملتی ہے ، جہاں بھرتا خاندان کے تخت پر بیٹھے ہوئے کسی شخص کو سنیارٹی (عمر میں بڑھے) کی بنیاد پر نہیں بلکہ برتری کی بنیاد پر منتخب کیا گیا تھا۔ لیکن ان کے بھیشما نے ستی وتی کے والد سے وعدہ کیا تھا تو انہوں نے اس عزم کا اظہار کیا کہ وہ کبھی بھی کورو خاندان کے تخت پر نہیں بیٹھیں گے اور ستی وتی کا سب سے بڑا بیٹا ہاسٹین پور کے سہاسن کا وارث ہوگا۔ اس غلطی کے نتیجے میں ، سب جانتے ہیں کہ اسی عہد کی وجہ سے کورو خاندان تباہ ہوگیا۔

در حقیقت انتخابات ہمیں یہ آپشن دیتے ہیں کہ ہم کسی چیز میں بہتر انتخاب کا انتخاب کرسکتے ہیں۔ اگر انتخابات نہیں ہوتے ہیں تو معاشرے میں خود مختاری اور آمریت غالب ہوگی۔ جس کا نتیجہ ہمیشہ تباہ کن رہا ہے۔ ان ممالک میں جہاں لوگوں کو اپنے قائد منتخب کرنے کی آزادی ہے ، وہ ہمیشہ ترقی کرتے ہیں۔ یہی وجہ ہے کہ انتخابات اتنے اہم اور ضروری ہیں۔

انتخابات اور جمہوریت ایک دوسرے کے ضمنی ہیں ، ایک دوسرے کے بغیر تصور بھی نہیں کیا جاسکتا۔ در حقیقت جمہوریت کی ترقی کے لئے انتخابات بہت اہم ہیں۔ اگر کسی جمہوری ملک میں مقررہ وقفوں پر انتخابات نہیں کروائے جاتے ہیں تو پھر خود مختاری اور آمریت کا غلبہ ہوگا۔ لہذا ایک جمہوری ملک میں انتخابات کچھ وقفوں سے ضروری ہیں۔ اور ہر شہری کو ان انتخابات میں آگے سے آگے بڑھکر حصہ لینا چاہیے اور صحیح قائد کا انتخاب کرکے اپنے ملک کے لیے اپنی ذمےداری اور محبت کا اظہار کرنا چاہیے۔

IMAGES

Essay on Democracy in Urdu Mazmoon for Class 10 and 12 Jamhoriyat Per Essay
Easy And Short Essay On Democracy In Urdu With Urdu Poetry
Urdu Story & Articles: Democracy in Pakistan Essay in urdu By Orya
Essay on Democracy in Pakistan in Urdu
Urdu Story & Articles: Short Essay on Democracy in Urdu
Pakistan-Movement-Restoration-Democracy-Urdu_translation-a11_Page_3

VIDEO

essay on democracy in english/democracy essay/essay on democracy
Easy And Short Essay On Democracy In Urdu With Urdu Poetry
Failure of Parliamentary Democracy in Pakistan
lecture on democracy .urdu lecture ###/ international relation
Essay on Terrorism in Urdu|Terrorism Essay in Urdu Handwriting|Dahshat Gardi pr Mazmoon|دہشت گردی
10 lines on Democracy in Urdu

COMMENTS

Essay On Democracy In Urdu
Essay On Democracy In Urdu- In this article we are going to read Essay On Democracy In Urdu | جمہوریت پر ایک مضمون, democracy in pakistan essay in urdu. struggle for democracy in pakistan, essay on democracy in india in urdu, what is your opinion about democracy in india. importance of democracy in india. importance of democracy in india essay in urdu
جمہوریت پر مضمون
Essay on Democracy in Urdu جمہوریت کی تعریف جمہوریت حکمرانی کا ایک ایسا نظام ہے جس میں طاقت عوام کو دی جاتی ہے، جس سے وہ فیصلہ سازی میں حصہ لیتے ہیں اور اپنے نمائندوں کو جوابدہ ٹھہراتے ہیں۔
Essay On Jamhuriat In Urdu
Essay On Jamhuriat In Urdu- In this article we are going to read Essay On Jamhuriat In Urdu | جمہوریت پر ایک مضمون, youm e jamhuriat essay in urdu, jamhoriat ki tareef in urdu, democracy definition in urdu, pro-democracy meaning in urdu, ایک ایسا نظام جس میں عوام براہِ راست اپنے منتخب نمائندوں کے ذریعے حکومت کے ...
Essay on Democracy in Pakistan in Urdu
Democracy in Pakistan is a form of government whereby the nation is governed by elected representatives. The elected leaders are expected to represent the interests of all the citizens. In Pakistan, it is a fundamental principle of Islam that the ultimate authority in governing rests with Allah, who is the sole master of all affairs.
Speech On Democracy In Urdu
Speech On Democracy In Urdu- Read Speech On Democracy In Urdu, written speech on azaadi in urdu language, speech on democracy in pakistan in urdu, future of democracy in pakistan in urdu, write a speech on election in democracy in urdu, importance of election essay in urdu
What is Democracy? Democracy Explained in Urdu
In this video, we'll be discussing the concept of democracy in Urdu. We'll be covering topics like how democracy works, the benefits of democracy, and how to...
Democracy in Pakistan Essay with Quotations
Here are a few quotes related to democracy and its challenges in Pakistan: "A society that puts equality before freedom will get neither. A society that puts freedom before equality will get a high degree of both.". - Milton Friedman, Economist. "The greatest threat to democracy is not the enemies from without, but the enemies from ...
Democracy In Pakistan: Hopes And Hurdles
Since the creation of Pakistan in 1947, democracy in the country has been witnessing both hopes and hurdles. The founder of Pakistan, Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah was keen to introduce democratic system in Pakistan. However, his sudden death impeded its proper imposition.
What is Democracy? (Urdu)
Democracy is a political system featuring the principle of the 'rule by the people.'. Instead of having one person making all the decisions in a country, democracy brings together the views and interests of all people so that the future of the country can be decided based on all these views. A joint Urdu dubbing project of Mashal Books and ...
Essay on "Democracy in Pakistan" for CSS, and PMS
This is an Essay on "Democracy in Pakistan" for CSS, PMS, and Judiciary Examinations. Democracy is a form of government in which the people have the authority to deliberate and decide legislation, or to choose governing officials to do so.". Democracy is a system of government in which power is vested in the people and exercised by them ...
Lughat-e- Jamhuriya: Know Your Democracy in Urdu
The aaieen gives you all your constitutional rights, one of which is your right to vote, which is called Haq-e-raay-daahi in Urdu. One of the most important words related to democracy is intikhaab, which literally means selection. When used in a political context, intikhaab refers to the act of electing a representative, through the process of ...
Democracy in Chaos (Urdu) جمہوریت کی فکری اور عملی الجھنیں
Democracy in Chaos جمہوریت کی فکری اور عملی الجھنیں.pdf Al qalam 2010 Democracy in Chaos.pdf Content uploaded by Mustafeez Ahmad Alvi
The Real Concept of Democracy (Urdu) جمہوریت کی حقیقت
Abstract. Democracy in its real sense is the peoples power to participate and decide public affairs. The basic question faced by liberal model of democracy is to what extent it accommodate common ...
Urdu Essays List
Urdu Essays List 3- Here is the list of 100 topics of urdu mazameen in urdu, اردو مضامین, اردو ادبی مضامین, اسلامی مقالات اردو, urdu essay app, essays in urdu on different topics , free online urdu essays, siyasi mazameen, mazmoon nawesi, urdu mazmoon nigari ... Essay On Democracy In Urdu. 0 17 of 30 FREE ...
Future of Democracy in Pakistan
Democracy in Pakistan Hopes and Hurdles, Democracy in Pakistan Essay and Column, #Democracy #Pakistan #Essay - Democracy Ka Mustakbil in Pakistan - Urdu Arti...
Free and Fair Elections in Pakistan: The Cornerstone of a Thriving
Free and fair elections are not a luxury; they are the bedrock of a just, prosperous, and stable Pakistan. By prioritizing electoral integrity, Pakistan can unlock its full potential and build a future where every citizen has a voice, a chance to participate, and a stake in the nation's success. The journey towards this ideal will require ...
Democracy Meaning In Urdu
Democracy Meaning In Urdu. Democracy Meaning in English to Urdu is جمہوریت, as written in Urdu and Jamhoriat, as written in Roman Urdu. There are many synonyms of Democracy which include Commonwealth, Egalitarianism, Emancipation, Equalitarianism, Equality, Freedom, Justice, Republic, Suffrage, Representative Government, Liberal ...
Essay on Democracy in Urdu Mazmoon for Class 10 and 12 ...
Essay on Democracy in Urdu Mazmoon for Class 10 and 12 Jamhoriyat Per Essay#muhammadrehman #urduessay #urdumazmoon Website: https://allurduessay.blogspot.com/
Democracy Meaning in Urdu Jamhoriat جمہوریت
The word "Democracy" means جمہوریت (Jamhoriat) in Urdu. Democracy refers to (n.) Collectively, the people, regarded as the source of government. (n.) Government by the people; a form of government in which the supreme power is retained and directly exercised by the people. (n.) The principles and policy of the Democratic party, so called ...
Essay On Election In Urdu
Essay On Eid Milad Un Nabi In Urdu. Essay On Election In Urdu- In this article we are going to read Essay On Election In Urdu, جمہوریت میں انتخابات کا کردار, uff yeh election mazmoon in urdu, vote ki ahmiyat speech in urdu, election mazmoon in urdu, جمہوریت میں الیکشن کا بہت اہم کردار ہے ...
Easy And Short Essay On Democracy In Urdu With Urdu Poetry
#Democracy#ShortEssayOnDemocracy#ShortEssayOnDemocracyInUrdu#EssayOnDemocracyInUrdu#BestUrduPoetryOnDemocracy#UrduPoetryOnDemocracy#BestUrduPoetryOnDemocracy...
Essay on democracy in urdu for how many words in a short essay
If you are likely to behave urdu in on essay democracy in the mid-1976s (e.G. Therefore, although recognising that the author assumes the meaning of particular modes of representation in specific content targets are mainly focused on either the same vein, shlomith rimmon-kenan s narrative representation across media the distribution of f table with a starting point.
Essay on Democracy in Urdu
Democracy . Essay on democracy . Urdu essay on democracy. Essay on democracy in urdu. #democracy #essayinurdu #urduessay #handwriting #urduhandwriting #mypoi...